Huber-Lang Markus, Palmer Annette, Grab Claudia, Boeckers Anja, Boeckers Tobias Maria, Oechsner Wolfgang
University Hospital of Ulm, Medical School, Institute for Clinical- and Experimental Trauma-Immunology, Ulm, Germany.
University of Ulm, Medical Faculty, Dean's Office, Ulm, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 May 15;34(2):Doc25. doi: 10.3205/zma001102. eCollection 2017.
Competence orientation, often based on the CanMEDS model, has become an important goal for modern curricula in medical education. The National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) has been adopted in Germany. However, it is currently unknown whether the vision of competence orientation has also reached the licensing examination procedures. Therefore, a prospective, descriptive, single-centre, exemplary study design was applied to evaluate 4051 questions/tasks (from 28 examiners at 7 two-day licensing oral-practical exams) for undergraduate medical students at the University of Ulm. The oral and practical questions/tasks as well as the real bedside assessment were assigned to specific competence roles (NKLM section I), categories (NKLM section II) and taxonomy levels of learning domains. Numerous questions/tasks were set per candidate (day 1/2: 70±24/86±19 questions) in the licensing oral-practical exam. Competence roles beyond the "medical expert" were scarcely considered. Furthermore, practical and communication skills at the bedside were hardly addressed (less than 3/15 min). Strikingly, there was a significant predominance of questions with a low-level taxonomy. The data indicate a misalignment of competence-oriented frameworks and the "real world" licensing practical-oral medical exam, which needs improvement in both evaluation and education processes.
以能力为导向,通常基于CanMEDS模型,已成为现代医学教育课程的重要目标。德国采用了《本科医学教育基于国家能力的学习目标目录》(NKLM)。然而,目前尚不清楚以能力为导向的愿景是否也已延伸至执照考试程序。因此,我们采用前瞻性、描述性、单中心的示范性研究设计,对乌尔姆大学本科医学生的4051道问题/任务(来自7场为期两天的执照口试实践考试中的28名考官)进行评估。口试和实践问题/任务以及实际床边评估被分配到特定的能力角色(NKLM第一部分)、类别(NKLM第二部分)和学习领域的分类层次。在执照口试实践考试中,每位考生设置了大量问题/任务(第1/2天:70±24/86±19道问题)。除“医学专家”之外的能力角色几乎未被考虑。此外,床边的实践和沟通技能几乎未被涉及(少于3/15分钟)。引人注目的是,低层次分类问题占显著优势。数据表明,以能力为导向的框架与“现实世界”的执照实践口试医学考试不一致,这在评估和教育过程中都需要改进。