• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎低耐药菌风险患者的死亡率:β-内酰胺类药物联合大环内酯类药物治疗的影响。

Mortality in patients with community-onset pneumonia at low risk of drug-resistant pathogens: Impact of β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Biostatistics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Respirology. 2018 May;23(5):526-534. doi: 10.1111/resp.13232. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1111/resp.13232
PMID:29239493
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-resistant pathogen (DRP) risk stratification is important for choosing a treatment strategy for community-onset pneumonia. Evidence for benefits of non-antipseudomonal β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy (BLM) on mortality is limited in patients at low DRP risk. Risk factors for mortality remain to be clarified.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis using a prospective multicentre study cohort of community-onset pneumonia was performed to assess 30-day differences in mortality between non-antipseudomonal β-lactam monotherapy (BL) and BLM groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the therapeutic effect and risk factors for mortality in patients at low DRP risk.

RESULTS

In total, 594 patients with community-onset pneumonia at low DRP risk (369 BL and 225 BLM) were analysed. The 30-day mortality in BL and BLM was 13.8% and 1.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that BLM reduced the 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.87) compared with BL. Independent prognostic factors for 30-day mortality included arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO ) > 50 mm Hg, white blood cell count < 4000/mm , non-ambulatory status, albumin < 3.0 g/dL, haematocrit < 30%, age ≥ 80 years, respiratory rate > 25/min and body temperature < 36°C.

CONCLUSION

In patients with community-onset pneumonia at low DRP risk, BLM treatment reduced 30-day mortality compared with BL. Independent risk factors for mortality are potential confounding factors when assessing antibiotic effects in randomized clinical trials.

摘要

背景与目的

耐药病原体(DRP)风险分层对于选择社区获得性肺炎的治疗策略非常重要。低 DRP 风险患者中,联合使用非抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物加大环内酯类药物(BLM)治疗在死亡率方面的获益证据有限。死亡的危险因素仍需阐明。

方法

对一项社区获得性肺炎的前瞻性多中心研究队列进行了事后分析,以评估非抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物单药治疗(BL)与 BLM 组之间 30 天死亡率的差异。采用 logistic 回归分析评估低 DRP 风险患者的治疗效果和死亡率的危险因素。

结果

共分析了 594 例低 DRP 风险的社区获得性肺炎患者(BL 组 369 例,BLM 组 225 例)。BL 和 BLM 组的 30 天死亡率分别为 13.8%和 1.8%(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,与 BL 相比,BLM 降低了 30 天死亡率(调整后的优势比:0.28,95%CI:0.09-0.87)。30 天死亡率的独立预后因素包括动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO )>50mmHg、白细胞计数<4000/mm 、非卧床状态、白蛋白<3.0g/dL、红细胞压积<30%、年龄≥80 岁、呼吸频率>25/min 和体温<36°C。

结论

在低 DRP 风险的社区获得性肺炎患者中,与 BL 相比,BLM 治疗降低了 30 天死亡率。死亡率的独立危险因素可能是评估随机临床试验中抗生素效果的混杂因素。

相似文献

1
Mortality in patients with community-onset pneumonia at low risk of drug-resistant pathogens: Impact of β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy.社区获得性肺炎低耐药菌风险患者的死亡率:β-内酰胺类药物联合大环内酯类药物治疗的影响。
Respirology. 2018 May;23(5):526-534. doi: 10.1111/resp.13232. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Impact of intravenous {beta}-lactam/macrolide versus {beta}-lactam monotherapy on mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.静脉注射β-内酰胺类/大环内酯类药物与β-内酰胺类单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者死亡率的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 May;63(5):1025-33. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp088. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
3
β-Lactam/macrolide dual therapy versus β-lactam monotherapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.β-内酰胺/大环内酯类双联治疗与β-内酰胺单药治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jun;69(6):1441-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku033. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
4
β-Lactam monotherapy vs β-lactam-macrolide combination treatment in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized noninferiority trial.β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺-大环内酯类药物联合治疗中度社区获得性肺炎的随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1894-901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4887.
5
Effect of β-Lactam Plus Macrolide Versus Fluoroquinolone on 30-Day Readmissions for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类联合大环内酯类与氟喹诺酮类药物对社区获得性肺炎 30 天再入院的影响。
Am J Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;27(2):e177-e182. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000788.
6
Effect of Combined β-Lactam/Macrolide Therapy on Mortality According to the Microbial Etiology and Inflammatory Status of Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类/大环内酯类联合治疗对社区获得性肺炎患者微生物病因和炎症状态相关死亡率的影响。
Chest. 2019 Apr;155(4):795-804. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia in adults.成人社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1312-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406330.
8
Effectiveness of β-Lactam Monotherapy vs Macrolide Combination Therapy for Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia.β-内酰胺单药治疗与大环内酯类联合治疗对肺炎住院儿童的有效性
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1184-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3225.
9
Comparative effectiveness of empiric β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.经验性β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺-大环内酯类联合治疗对儿童社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效比较。
J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;161(6):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.067. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
10
Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia.退伍军人事务部住院社区获得性肺炎患者中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类联合治疗与氟喹诺酮类单药治疗的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov;51(11):3977-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00006-07. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of macrolide treatment on long-term mortality in patients admitted to the ICU due to CAP: a targeted maximum likelihood estimation and survival analysis.大环内酯类药物治疗对因 CAP 入住 ICU 患者的长期死亡率的影响:靶向极大似然估计和生存分析。
Crit Care. 2023 May 31;27(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04466-x.
2
Unmet needs in pneumonia research: a comprehensive approach by the CAPNETZ study group.肺炎研究中的未满足需求:CAPNETZ 研究小组的综合方法。
Respir Res. 2022 Sep 10;23(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02117-3.
3
A prediction rule for severe adverse events in all inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicenter observational study.
社区获得性肺炎所有住院患者严重不良事件的预测规则:一项多中心观察性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01819-0.
4
The Role of Macrolides for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Pneumonia by the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Position Paper by Four Medical Societies from Greece.大环内酯类药物在社区获得性肺炎及新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)所致肺炎管理中的作用:希腊四个医学协会的立场文件
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Jun 16:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00471-1.
5
Management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in ICU: statement from front-line intensive care experts in Wuhan, China.中国武汉一线重症监护专家关于新冠肺炎危重症患者的管理声明
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 6;10(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00689-1.
6
Hot topics and current controversies in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的热点问题与当前争议
Breathe (Sheff). 2019 Sep;15(3):216-225. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0205-2019.
7
Contemporary Concise Review 2018: Respiratory infections and tuberculosis.《2018年当代简明综述:呼吸道感染与结核病》
Respirology. 2019 Jun;24(6):598-604. doi: 10.1111/resp.13542. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
8
Validation of the prediction rules identifying drug-resistant pathogens in community-onset pneumonia.用于识别社区获得性肺炎中耐药病原体的预测规则的验证
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Oct 11;11:1703-1713. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S165669. eCollection 2018.
9
Appropriate antibiotic management of bacterial lower respiratory tract infections.细菌性下呼吸道感染的适当抗生素管理。
F1000Res. 2018 Jul 23;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14226.1. eCollection 2018.
10
Multifaceted Role of Pneumolysin in the Pathogenesis of Myocardial Injury in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.肺炎链球菌溶血素在社区获得性肺炎致心肌损伤发病机制中的多效作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 11;19(4):1147. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041147.