Suppr超能文献

创意个体是害群之马吗?不道德行为的双重路径模型。

Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior.

机构信息

School of Business.

Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2018 Apr;103(4):416-431. doi: 10.1037/apl0000290. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Abstract

Research has been inconsistent in its quest to discover whether dispositional creativity is associated with more or less unethical behavior. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose that moral disengagement and moral imagination are 2 parallel mechanisms that encourage or inhibit unethical behavior, and that which of these mediation processes occur depends on moral identity. Study 1, a 3-wave study of a food service organization, shows that employees high on both dispositional creativity and moral identity are less likely to be morally disengaged and behave less unethically. The results of Study 2 replicate Study 1's findings in a scenario-based study of college students, and further show that individuals who are high on both dispositional creativity and moral identity are more likely to be morally imaginative and to behave less unethically. Theoretical and practical implications of our model are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

研究一直未能确定性格创造力是否与更多或更少的不道德行为有关。本研究以社会认知理论为基础,提出道德脱离和道德想象是鼓励或抑制不道德行为的 2 个平行机制,而这些中介过程的发生取决于道德认同。第一项研究是对一家餐饮服务组织进行的 3 波研究,结果表明,性格创造力和道德认同都高的员工不太可能道德脱离,不道德行为也较少。第二项研究在大学生情景研究中复制了研究 1 的发现,进一步表明,性格创造力和道德认同都高的个体更有可能具有道德想象力,不道德行为也较少。我们的模型具有理论和实践意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验