• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得紧急医疗保健的权利:欧洲人权法院突破界限。

A Right to Access to Emergency Health Care: The European Court of Human Rights Pushes the Envelope.

作者信息

Nissen Aleydis

机构信息

Department of Law, School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2018 Nov 1;26(4):693-702. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx059.

DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwx059
PMID:29240944
Abstract

This article argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) seems to have recently acknowledged that there is a right to access to emergency health care in the member states of the Council of Europe. The Chamber of the ECtHR found that a state's failure to design a regulatory framework that guarantees access to health care in emergency situations violates the substantial limb of Article 2 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) that protects the right to life. It is argued that the newly established requirements seem to be reasonable but that there seem to be no sufficient safeguards to ensure that the ECtHR does not substitute its own assessment for that of medical professionals.

摘要

本文认为,欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)最近似乎已承认,在欧洲理事会成员国中存在获得紧急医疗保健的权利。欧洲人权法院分庭认定,一国未能设计出一个确保在紧急情况下获得医疗保健的监管框架,违反了《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)第2条中保护生命权的实质性条款。有人认为,新确立的要求似乎合理,但似乎没有足够的保障措施来确保欧洲人权法院不会以自身的评估取代医学专业人员的评估。

相似文献

1
A Right to Access to Emergency Health Care: The European Court of Human Rights Pushes the Envelope.获得紧急医疗保健的权利:欧洲人权法院突破界限。
Med Law Rev. 2018 Nov 1;26(4):693-702. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx059.
2
Reproductive health information and abortion services: standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights.生殖健康信息和堕胎服务:欧洲人权法院制定的标准。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;122(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.欧洲人权法院所作裁决的医学与法律问题
Georgian Med News. 2017 Jan(262):77-81.
4
Post-traumatic stress disorder, human rights and access to healthcare: an analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective.创伤后应激障碍、人权与医疗保健的获得:从伦理视角分析欧洲人权法院的判决。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 22;12(1):1930704. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1930704.
5
Strasbourg Medical Expulsion Rulings: Beyond the Deathbed Requirement.斯特拉斯堡医疗驱逐裁决:超越临终要求。
Eur J Health Law. 2020 Mar 2;27(2):115-124. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12251008.
6
European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2007/15. Decision as to the admissibility of Eglert v. Sweden, 20 September 2007, no. 39432/04 (Third Section).欧洲人权法院。欧洲人权法院2007/15号案件。关于埃格勒特诉瑞典案可受理性的裁决,2007年9月20日,第39432/04号(第三庭)
Eur J Health Law. 2007 Dec;14(4):395-7.
7
Protecting mental health clients' dignity - the importance of legal control.保护精神健康客户的尊严 - 法律控制的重要性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
8
Psychiatric commitment: over 50 years of case law from the European Court of Human Rights.精神病强制收治:欧洲人权法院五十多年的判例法
Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;21(7):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
9
Psychiatric commitment: over 50 years of case law from the European Court of Human Rights.精神病强制收治:欧洲人权法院50多年的判例法
Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;22(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
10
Surrogacy and the ECtHR: Reflections on Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy.代孕与欧洲人权法院:对Paradiso和Campanelli诉意大利案的思考
Med Law Rev. 2019 Feb 1;27(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy002.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to Healthcare for Minors: An Ethical Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.未成年人的医疗保健:欧洲人权法院判决的伦理分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;9(10):1361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101361.