Iliadou Marianna
Durham Law School, UK.
Med Law Rev. 2019 Feb 1;27(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy002.
This case note analyses the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy and examines its implications for cross-border surrogacy in Europe. It is argued that this judgment is highly significant, because it sets new standards in terms of the concept of family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This judgment, it is argued, only appears to bring a halt to the (seemingly) backdoor legitimacy of commercial surrogacy established by the findings of the Second Section and previous judgments of the Court. Finally, this case note critiques the Grand Chamber's findings and examines its likely impact on the problem of cross-border surrogacy.
本案例分析了欧洲人权法院对Paradiso和Campanelli诉意大利案的最新判决，并探讨了其对欧洲跨境代孕的影响。有人认为，这一判决意义重大，因为它在《欧洲人权公约》第八条规定的家庭生活概念方面设定了新标准。有人认为，这一判决似乎只是终止了由第二庭的裁决和法院先前判决所确立的商业代孕（看似）间接合法化的情况。最后，本案例分析批评了大法庭的裁决，并探讨了其对跨境代孕问题可能产生的影响。
