1 Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine and.
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, Colorado; and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 1;197(7):897-904. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1132OC.
The neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium may improve mortality for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Other neuromuscular blocking agents, such as vecuronium, are commonly used and have different mechanisms of action, side effects, cost, and availability in the setting of drug shortages.
To determine whether cisatracurium is associated with improved outcomes when compared with vecuronium in patients at risk for and with ARDS.
Using a nationally representative database, patients who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor, received mechanical ventilation, and were treated with a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agent for at least 2 days within 2 days of hospital admission were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received cisatracurium or vecuronium. Propensity matching was used to balance both patient- and hospital-specific factors. Outcomes included hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital duration, and discharge location.
Propensity matching successfully balanced all covariates for 3,802 patients (1,901 per group). There was no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.932; P = 0.40) or hospital days (-0.66 d; P = 0.411) between groups. However, patients treated with cisatracurium had fewer ventilator days (-1.01 d; P = 0.005) and ICU days (-0.98 d; P = 0.028) but were equally likely to be discharged home (odds ratio, 1.19; P = 0.056).
When compared with vecuronium, cisatracurium was not associated with a difference in mortality but was associated with improvements in other clinically important outcomes. These data suggest that cisatracurium may be the preferred neuromuscular blocking agent for patients at risk for and with ARDS.
神经肌肉阻滞剂顺式阿曲库铵可能会改善中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的死亡率。其他神经肌肉阻滞剂,如维库溴铵,通常被用于临床,且在药物短缺的情况下,具有不同的作用机制、副作用、成本和可及性。
在有 ARDS 风险和 ARDS 患者中,与维库溴铵相比,顺式阿曲库铵是否会改善结局。
利用一个全国代表性数据库,纳入了在入院 2 天内入住 ICU、诊断为 ARDS 或 ARDS 风险因素、接受机械通气、并接受至少 2 天连续神经肌肉阻滞剂输注治疗的患者。患者被分为两组:顺式阿曲库铵组或维库溴铵组。采用倾向性匹配来平衡患者和医院的特定因素。结局包括院内死亡率、机械通气时间、ICU 和住院时间以及出院地点。
倾向性匹配成功地平衡了 3802 例患者(每组 1901 例)的所有协变量。两组间死亡率(优势比,0.932;P=0.40)或住院天数(-0.66 d;P=0.411)均无显著差异。然而,顺式阿曲库铵治疗组的呼吸机天数(-1.01 d;P=0.005)和 ICU 天数(-0.98 d;P=0.028)更少,但出院回家的可能性相同(优势比,1.19;P=0.056)。
与维库溴铵相比,顺式阿曲库铵与死亡率无差异相关,但与其他临床重要结局的改善相关。这些数据表明,顺式阿曲库铵可能是有 ARDS 风险和 ARDS 患者的首选神经肌肉阻滞剂。