1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA. 2Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 3Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA. 4Division of General Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA. 5Department of Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 6OptiStatim, LLC, Longmeadow, MA. 7Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center Anesthesiology Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829eb7c9.
Recent trials suggest that treatment with neuromuscular blocking agents may improve survival in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. We examined the association between receipt of a neuromuscular blocking agent and in-hospital mortality among mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.
A pharmacoepidemiologic cohort study of patients with sepsis and a respiratory infection who had been admitted to intensive care and placed on mechanical ventilation within the first 2 days of hospitalization. We used propensity score matching and instrumental variable methods to compare the outcomes of patients treated with neuromuscular blocking agents within the first 2 hospital days to those who were not. Sensitivity analysis was used to model the effects of a hypothetical unmeasured confounder.
Three hundred thirty-nine U.S. hospitals that participated in the Premier Perspective database between 2004 and 2006.
Seven thousand eight hundred sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,818 (23%) who were treated with a neuromuscular blocking agent by hospital day 2.
None.
Patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents were younger (mean age, 62 vs 68), more likely to be treated with vasopressors (69% vs 65%) and had a lower in-hospital mortality rate (31.9% vs 38.3%, p < 0.001). In 3,518 patients matched on the propensity for treatment, receipt of a neuromuscular blocking agent was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80, 0.96). An analysis using the hospital neuromuscular blocking agent-prescribing rate as an instrumental variable found receipt of a neuromuscular blocking agent associated with a 4.3% (95% CI, -11.5%, 1.5%) reduction in in-hospital mortality.
Among mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and respiratory infection, early treatment with a neuromuscular blocking agent is associated with lower in-hospital mortality.
最近的试验表明,在需要机械通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者中,使用神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗可能会提高生存率。我们研究了在因严重败血症而接受机械通气的患者中,接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗与院内死亡率之间的关联。
一项对败血症和呼吸道感染患者的药物流行病学队列研究,这些患者在入院后前 2 天内被收入重症监护病房并接受机械通气。我们使用倾向评分匹配和工具变量方法比较了在前 2 天内接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者的结局。敏感性分析用于对假设的未测量混杂因素进行建模。
2004 年至 2006 年期间参与 Premier Perspective 数据库的美国 339 家医院。
符合纳入标准的 7864 名患者,其中 1818 名(23%)在入院后第 2 天接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗。
无。
接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗的患者更年轻(平均年龄 62 岁 vs. 68 岁),更有可能接受血管加压素治疗(69% vs. 65%),院内死亡率更低(31.9% vs. 38.3%,p<0.001)。在 3518 名根据治疗倾向匹配的患者中,接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗与院内死亡率降低相关(风险比,0.88;95%置信区间,0.80,0.96)。使用医院神经肌肉阻滞剂处方率作为工具变量的分析发现,接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗与院内死亡率降低 4.3%(95%置信区间,-11.5%,1.5%)相关。
在因严重败血症和呼吸道感染而接受机械通气的患者中,早期使用神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗与较低的院内死亡率相关。