• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非小细胞肺癌教育计划对多学科团队的影响。

Impact of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Educational Program for Interdisciplinary Teams.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.

American College of Chest Physicians, Glenview, IL.

出版信息

Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.032
PMID:29246769
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful implementation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evidence-based guideline recommendations requires effective educational programs that target all clinicians from interdisciplinary teams. This study describes and evaluates the Engaging an Interdisciplinary Team for NSCLC (GAIN 3.0) experiential learning-based educational curriculum.

METHODS

GAIN 3.0 was designed to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration for effective NSCLC diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. The program used a flipped classroom model that included an e-learning component prior to a live 6-hour interactive program. The interactive program included hands-on simulations, small group workshops, gamification, and case discussions. Participants included academic and community members of multidisciplinary lung cancer teams. Assessments included an online baseline survey, a pretest and posttest, a program evaluation, a long-term survey (LTS), and on-site faculty evaluation of participants.

RESULTS

Of 416 attendees to 13 live GAIN 3.0 programs (nine in the United States and four in Europe), 304 (73%) completed the pretest and 187 (45%) completed the posttest. Out of a perfect score of 12 points, program participants had a mean test score of 6.3 ± 2.1 on the pretest (52%) and 7.8 ± 2.1 on the posttest (65%) (P = .03). There was an overall knowledge increase of 13% from pretest to posttest. Most LTS respondents (65%) rated the GAIN 3.0 live programs as "high impact." On the LTS, the areas with the greatest gains in participants who had very high confidence were communication across disciplines, use of a team-based approach, and personalized treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GAIN 3.0 was a highly successful interdisciplinary activity that improved participants' knowledge, competence, and likely the clinical care provided to patients with NSCLC.

摘要

背景

成功实施非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)循证指南建议需要有针对跨学科团队所有临床医生的有效教育计划。本研究描述并评估了以体验式学习为基础的跨学科非小细胞肺癌协作教育课程(GAIN 3.0)。

方法

GAIN 3.0 的设计目的是增强跨学科协作,以实现有效的 NSCLC 诊断、评估和治疗。该方案采用翻转课堂模式,在为期 6 小时的现场互动课程之前,包括一个电子学习部分。互动课程包括实践模拟、小组研讨会、游戏化和病例讨论。参与者包括多学科肺癌团队的学术和社区成员。评估包括在线基线调查、前测和后测、方案评估、长期调查(LTS)以及现场对参与者的教师评估。

结果

在 13 次现场 GAIN 3.0 课程(美国 9 次,欧洲 4 次)的 416 名与会者中,有 304 名(73%)完成了前测,187 名(45%)完成了后测。在 12 分满分中,方案参与者的前测平均得分为 6.3 ± 2.1(52%),后测平均得分为 7.8 ± 2.1(65%)(P =.03)。从前测到后测,知识总体增长了 13%。大多数 LTS 受访者(65%)认为 GAIN 3.0 现场课程具有“高影响力”。在 LTS 中,对非常有信心的参与者来说,学科间交流、使用团队方法和个性化治疗这三个领域的获益最大。

结论

GAIN 3.0 是一项非常成功的跨学科活动,提高了参与者的知识、能力,可能还提高了为 NSCLC 患者提供的临床护理水平。

相似文献

1
Impact of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Educational Program for Interdisciplinary Teams.非小细胞肺癌教育计划对多学科团队的影响。
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Educational outcomes in the era of the Affordable Care Act: impact of personalized education about non-small cell lung cancer.《平价医疗法案》时代的教育成果:非小细胞肺癌个性化教育的影响
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Spring;35 Suppl 1:S5-12. doi: 10.1002/chp.21292.
3
Evaluation of online training on the prevention of venous thromboembolism.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Feb;45(2):146-56. doi: 10.1177/1538574410391281. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Team- and case-based learning to activate participants and enhance knowledge: an evaluation of seminars in Germany.基于团队和案例的学习以激发参与者并增强知识:对德国研讨会的评估
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Summer;28(3):165-71. doi: 10.1002/chp.175.
6
Pilot Study of an Interprofessional Palliative Care Curriculum: Course Content and Participant-Reported Learning Gains.跨专业姑息治疗课程的试点研究:课程内容及参与者报告的学习收获
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):390-397. doi: 10.1177/1049909117725042. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
The rural interdisciplinary team training program: a workforce development workshop to increase geriatrics knowledge and skills for rural providers.农村跨学科团队培训项目:一个旨在提高农村医疗服务提供者老年医学知识和技能的劳动力发展研讨会。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2019 Jan-Mar;40(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2018.1454917. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Combining participatory action research and appreciative inquiry to design, deliver and evaluate an interdisciplinary continuing education program for a regional health workforce.结合参与式行动研究与肯定性探究,为区域卫生人力设计、提供和评估一个跨学科继续教育项目。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):345-351. doi: 10.1071/AH17124.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered interprofessional education in cancer care: a systematic scoping review.以患者为中心的癌症护理跨专业教育:一项系统的范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06600-x.
2
Acceptability, Utility, and Cost of a Mobile Health Cancer Screening Education Application for Training Primary Care Physicians in India.移动医疗癌症筛查教育应用在培训印度初级保健医生方面的可接受性、实用性和成本。
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):e2192-e2199. doi: 10.1002/onco.13904. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Auditorium of the future: e learning platform.
未来讲堂:电子学习平台。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):2038-2043. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.69.
4
The Effectiveness of mHealth and eHealth Tools in Improving Provider Knowledge, Confidence, and Behaviors Related to Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: a Systematic Review.移动医疗和电子医疗工具在提高医疗服务提供者在癌症检测、治疗和生存护理方面的知识、信心和行为方面的有效性:系统评价。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Dec;36(6):1134-1146. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01961-z. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Higher Age Puts Lung Cancer Patients at Risk for Not Receiving Anti-cancer Treatment.高龄使肺癌患者面临无法接受抗癌治疗的风险。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;51(3):1241-1248. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.513. Epub 2018 Dec 31.