Fragner Tobias, Hama Honja, Šerifović Adis, Kirchheiner Kathrin, Grabovac Igor
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Open Innovation in Science Center, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06600-x.
Cancer remains a critical global health issue requiring a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach for effective treatment. Interprofessional education (IPE) is essential for overcoming barriers to collaboration among healthcare professionals and fostering efficient teamwork in cancer care.
This systematic scoping review aims to explore the role of IPE in enhancing interprofessional collaboration within cancer care by mapping and synthesizing the implementation, impact, and evaluation strategies of patient-centered IPE programs in this field.
A comprehensive search was conducted across seven databases, including CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science, from their inception to January 2024. Grey literature was also sought through online sources and by contacting relevant organizations. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively following a standardized protocol.
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting various educational methods such as web-based platforms, face-to-face interactions, experiential learning, and simulation-based training. Patient-centered IPE programs notably improved interprofessional collaboration, communication, knowledge, and self-confidence among healthcare professionals. Additionally, several programs led to concrete changes in clinical practice and institutional policies. Evaluation strategies primarily utilized established frameworks such as Kirkpatrick's model and Moore's outcome levels to assess multiple layers of outcomes, including participant satisfaction, knowledge acquisition, competence, and behavior change.
The findings indicate that patient-centered IPE programs effectively promote interprofessional collaboration and enhance clinical competencies in cancer care. Future research should focus on long-term evaluations, address systemic barriers, expand geographical scope, and utilize standardized evaluation frameworks to further improve the design and implementation of patient-centered IPE programs in cancer care.
癌症仍然是一个关键的全球健康问题,需要采取全面的跨学科方法进行有效治疗。跨专业教育(IPE)对于克服医疗保健专业人员之间的合作障碍以及促进癌症护理中的高效团队合作至关重要。
本系统综述旨在通过梳理和综合该领域以患者为中心的IPE项目的实施、影响和评估策略,探讨IPE在加强癌症护理中的跨专业合作方面的作用。
从七个数据库(包括CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE、PsycInfo、Scopus和Web of Science)自建库起至2024年1月进行了全面检索。还通过在线资源和联系相关组织来查找灰色文献。按照标准化方案对数据进行提取和叙述性综合。
七项研究符合纳入标准,突出了各种教育方法,如基于网络的平台、面对面互动、体验式学习和模拟培训。以患者为中心的IPE项目显著改善了医疗保健专业人员之间的跨专业合作、沟通、知识和自信心。此外,一些项目还导致了临床实践和机构政策的具体变化。评估策略主要利用已建立的框架,如柯克帕特里克模型和摩尔的结果层次来评估多层结果,包括参与者满意度、知识获取、能力和行为改变。
研究结果表明,以患者为中心的IPE项目有效地促进了跨专业合作,并提高了癌症护理中的临床能力。未来的研究应侧重于长期评估、解决系统性障碍、扩大地理范围,并利用标准化评估框架进一步改进癌症护理中以患者为中心的IPE项目的设计和实施。