Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e019480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019480.
To evaluate temporal differences in the documentation of neurological findings by the same physicians in patients with ischaemic stroke while in hospital. We also investigated differences in the rate of documentation of neurological findings in patients with stroke between internists and neurosurgeons.
A retrospective medical chart review.
Hospitalised adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke who stayed 7 or more days in our hospital. Neurosurgeons (n=8) and internists (n=19) caring for these patients (including up to 10 patients per physician).
The documentation rate of any neurological finding in the patients on each day (from day 1 to 7 and on discharge). The documentation rates of eight neurological finding components (consciousness, mental status, cranial nerves, motor function, sensory function, coordination, reflexes and gait). We included only documentation by the same physician. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate differences in outcomes between neurosurgeons and internists.
During the study period, we identified 172 patients with stroke who were cared for by 27 physicians. The documentation rates of any neurological findings were 94% (day 1), 58% (day 2), 35% (day 3), 40% (day 4), 32% (day 5), 30% (day 6) and 23% (day 7). On discharge, all eight neurological finding components were documented in less than 10% of all cases. The documentation rate was significantly higher by internists than that by neurosurgeons on each day but not on discharge.
The documentation rate of neurological findings by physicians during usual stroke care decreased to less than 50% after the third hospital day. Given the importance of temporal changes in the neurological symptoms of patients with stroke, further study is needed to determine whether this low documentation rate after the third hospital day was due to a lack of physician interest in neurological findings or other factors.
评估同一位医师在住院期间对缺血性脑卒中患者神经系统检查结果记录的时间差异。我们还调查了内科医师和神经外科医师在记录脑卒中患者神经系统检查结果方面的差异。
回顾性病历审查。
在我院住院时间超过 7 天的急性缺血性脑卒中成年患者。照顾这些患者的神经外科医师(n=8)和内科医师(n=19)(每位医师最多照顾 10 位患者)。
每位患者在入院第 1 天至第 7 天和出院当天记录任何神经系统发现的记录率。八项神经系统发现成分(意识、精神状态、颅神经、运动功能、感觉功能、协调、反射和步态)的记录率。我们仅包括同一位医师的记录。Fisher 确切检验用于评估神经外科医师和内科医师之间结局的差异。
在研究期间,我们共确定了 172 例脑卒中患者,由 27 位医师进行治疗。任何神经系统发现的记录率分别为 94%(第 1 天)、58%(第 2 天)、35%(第 3 天)、40%(第 4 天)、32%(第 5 天)、30%(第 6 天)和 23%(第 7 天)。出院时,所有八项神经系统发现成分在不到 10%的病例中均有记录。内科医师的记录率在每一天均显著高于神经外科医师,但在出院时则不然。
在常规脑卒中治疗期间,医师对神经系统发现的记录率在第 3 天后降至不足 50%。鉴于脑卒中患者神经系统症状的时间变化的重要性,需要进一步研究以确定第 3 天后的低记录率是由于医师对神经系统发现的兴趣缺乏还是其他因素所致。