Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jan;126(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
The aim was to analyze position of CT-verified local recurrences (LR) and local control (LC) among three centers that used different GTV to CTV1 margins.
In total, 1576 patients completing radical primary IMRT for larynx, pharynx, oral cavity HNSCC in three centers in Denmark between 2006 and 2012 were included. CT-verified LRs were analyzed as possible points of recurrence origin and compared between groups of small (0-2.5 mm), larger (>2.5 mm), and anatomical GTV-CTV1 margins. The recurrence point's position relative to the GTV and 95% prescription dose was evaluated. Overall local control rate was evaluated using Cox uni- and multi-variate analysis.
After a median follow-up of 41 months, 272 patients had local failure. Median GTV-CTV1 margin in Center1, 2 and 3 was 0.0, 3.7 and 9.7 mm, respectively. 51% of local recurrences were inside the GTV. No difference in distribution of LRs in relation to GTV surface (p = 0.4) or the dose to LRs (p = 0.2) was detected between the groups. A difference in LC was found univariate between the centers (p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.4).
No relation was found between the recurrences' distributions as function of the margins used at three centers. In multivariate analysis, local control was not influenced by the centers.
本研究旨在分析在三个使用不同 GTV 至 CTV1 边界的中心中,经 CT 证实的局部复发(LR)和局部控制(LC)的位置。
总共纳入了 1576 名丹麦三个中心于 2006 年至 2012 年间接受根治性原发 IMRT 治疗的喉、咽、口腔 HNSCC 患者。分析了 CT 证实的局部复发作为可能的复发起源,并将其与小(0-2.5mm)、大(>2.5mm)和解剖 GTV-CTV1 边界组进行比较。评估了复发点相对于 GTV 和 95%处方剂量的位置。使用 Cox 单变量和多变量分析评估整体局部控制率。
中位随访 41 个月后,272 名患者发生局部失败。中心 1、2 和 3 的 GTV-CTV1 边界中位数分别为 0.0、3.7 和 9.7mm。51%的局部复发发生在 GTV 内。在 GTV 表面(p=0.4)或局部复发剂量(p=0.2)方面,LR 的分布在各组之间无差异。单变量分析显示中心之间的 LC 存在差异(p=0.03),但多变量分析(p=0.4)未发现差异。
在三个中心之间,未发现复发分布与所使用的边界之间存在关系。在多变量分析中,局部控制不受中心的影响。