Suppr超能文献

德语阅读不流畅者的词汇阅读

Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German.

作者信息

Gangl Melanie, Moll Kristina, Jones Manon W, Banfi Chiara, Schulte-Körne Gerd, Landerl Karin

机构信息

University of Graz.

University Hospital Munich.

出版信息

Sci Stud Read. 2017 Jul 25;22(1):24-40. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1339709. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic readers. We investigated variations in reading style in an eye-tracking paradigm with German dysfluent 3rd and 4th graders. Twenty-six TypFix-readers (fixation counts within the range of 47 age-matched typical readers) were compared with 42 HighFix-readers (increased fixation counts). Both groups showed lexical access: Words were read more efficiently than nonwords and pseudohomophones. TypFix-readers showed stronger reliance on lexical reading than HighFix-readers (smaller length effects for number of fixations and total reading time, stronger lexicality effects for gaze duration, stronger word-pseudohomophone effects for mean saccade amplitude). We conclude that in both groups, sublexical and lexical reading processes were impaired due to inefficient visual-verbal integration.

摘要

在德语这种正字法一致的语言中,阅读障碍的特征是阅读不流畅,人们通常认为这是由于未能建立正字法词汇表以及过度依赖解码所致。然而,早期证据表明,至少在一些德国阅读障碍读者中存在词汇处理效应。我们采用眼动追踪范式,对德国三、四年级阅读不流畅的学生的阅读风格差异进行了研究。将26名TypFix读者(注视次数在47次范围内,与年龄匹配的典型读者相同)与42名HighFix读者(注视次数增加)进行了比较。两组都表现出词汇通达:单词的阅读效率高于非单词和假同音字。TypFix读者比HighFix读者更依赖词汇阅读(注视次数和总阅读时间的长度效应更小,注视持续时间的词汇性效应更强,平均扫视幅度的单词 - 假同音字效应更强)。我们得出结论,在两组中,由于视觉 - 语言整合效率低下,亚词汇和词汇阅读过程均受到损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab7/5714164/7fd9cd72164e/HSSR_A_1339709_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验