Schmidt Stefanie J, Schultze-Lutter Frauke, Bendall Sarah, Groth Nicola, Michel Chantal, Inderbitzin Nadja, Schimmelmann Benno G, Hubl Daniela, Nelson Barnaby
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 20;8:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00242. eCollection 2017.
Suicidality is highly prevalent in patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Childhood adversities and trauma are generally predictive of suicidality. However, the differential effects of adversity/trauma-domains and CHR-criteria, i.e., ultra-high risk and basic symptom criteria, on suicidality remain unclear. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms and, thus, worthwhile targets for suicide-prevention are still poorly understood. Therefore, structural equation modeling was used to test theory-driven models in 73 CHR-patients. Mediators were psychological variables, i.e., beliefs about one's own competencies as well as the controllability of events and coping styles. In addition, symptomatic variables (depressiveness, basic symptoms, attenuated psychotic symptoms) were hypothesized to mediate the effect of psychological mediators on suicidality as the final outcome variable. Results showed two independent pathways. In the first pathway, emotional and sexual but not physical adversity/trauma was associated with suicidality, which was mediated by dysfunctional competence/control beliefs, a lack of positive coping-strategies and depressiveness. In the second pathway, cognitive basic symptoms but not attenuated psychotic symptoms mediated the relationship between trauma/adversity and suicidality. CHR-patients are, thus, particularly prone to suicidality if adversity/trauma is followed by the development of depressiveness. Regarding the second pathway, this is the first study showing that adversity/trauma led to suicidality through an increased risk for psychosis as indicated by cognitive basic symptoms. As insight is generally associated with suicidality, this may explain why self-experienced basic symptoms increase the risk for it. Consequently, these mediators should be monitored regularly and targeted by integrated interventions as early as possible to enhance resilience against suicidality.
自杀倾向在临床高风险(CHR)精神病患者中非常普遍。童年逆境和创伤通常可预测自杀倾向。然而,逆境/创伤领域与CHR标准(即超高风险和基本症状标准)对自杀倾向的差异影响仍不明确。此外,自杀预防的潜在机制以及有价值的目标仍知之甚少。因此,采用结构方程模型对73名CHR患者的理论驱动模型进行了测试。中介变量为心理变量,即对自身能力的信念以及事件的可控性和应对方式。此外,有症状变量(抑郁、基本症状、精神病性症状减弱)被假设为介导心理中介变量对自杀倾向这一最终结果变量的影响。结果显示了两条独立的路径。在第一条路径中,情感和性方面而非身体方面的逆境/创伤与自杀倾向相关,这是由功能失调的能力/控制信念、缺乏积极应对策略和抑郁介导的。在第二条路径中,认知基本症状而非精神病性症状减弱介导了创伤/逆境与自杀倾向之间的关系。因此,如果逆境/创伤之后出现抑郁,CHR患者特别容易出现自杀倾向。关于第二条路径,这是第一项研究表明逆境/创伤通过认知基本症状所表明的精神病风险增加而导致自杀倾向。由于洞察力通常与自杀倾向相关,这可能解释了为什么自我体验到的基本症状会增加自杀风险。因此,应定期监测这些中介变量,并尽早通过综合干预加以针对,以增强对自杀倾向的抵御能力。