• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?

Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?

作者信息

Bayraktar Onur, Aytaç Erman, Özben Volkan, Atasoy Deniz, Bilgin İsmail A, Erenler Bayraktar İlknur, Baca Bilgi, Hamzaoğlu İsmail, Karahasanoğlu Tayfun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500
PMID:29252933
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adoption of laparoscopic surgery for cancers requiring partial or total proctectomy has been slow due to difficulty of achieving oncologically adequate resection. Obesity is a factor complicating use and outcomes of laparoscopic technique for rectal surgery. Impact of obesity on the outcomes of robotic rectal surgery for cancer is not well defined. This study is designed to assess whether if the robotic technique has potential to overcome the limitations of obesity and to improve outcomes of minimally invasive rectal surgery for cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing robotic sphincter-saving radical resection with da Vinci Xi System between December 2014 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups as obese and nonobese. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes and short-term results were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The study included 101 patients (30 were obese). Sex (female: 35 vs. 37%, P=0.89), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2 vs. 2, P=0.41), number of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (39% vs. 23%, P=0.12) and history of prior abdominal surgery (28% vs. 23%, P=0.62) were comparable between the groups. Operative time was longer in the obese group (311 vs. 332 min. P=0.01). Overall complication rates (27% vs. 23%, P=0.72), length of hospital stay (6 vs. 7, P=0.10) and pathologic outcomes were similar between the groups. Conversion to laparoscopy was not required in any operation. Two nonobese patients required conversion to open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Robotic rectal surgery for cancer in obese patients is equally safe and effective as in nonobese patients. The new robotic platform can facilitate to overcome obesity-related limitations of rectal surgery.

摘要

背景

由于难以实现肿瘤学上充分的切除,腹腔镜手术在需要部分或全直肠切除术的癌症治疗中的应用进展缓慢。肥胖是使腹腔镜直肠手术技术的使用和结果复杂化的一个因素。肥胖对机器人直肠癌手术结果的影响尚不明确。本研究旨在评估机器人技术是否有潜力克服肥胖的限制,并改善微创直肠癌手术的结果。

患者与方法

纳入2014年12月至2016年12月期间使用达芬奇Xi系统进行机器人保留括约肌根治性切除术的患者。患者分为肥胖组和非肥胖组。比较两组患者的人口统计学、围手术期结果和短期结果。

结果

该研究纳入了101例患者(30例肥胖)。两组患者的性别(女性:35%对37%,P = 0.89)、美国麻醉医师协会评分(2对2,P = 0.41)、接受新辅助放化疗的患者数量(39%对23%,P = 0.12)以及既往腹部手术史(28%对23%,P = 0.62)具有可比性。肥胖组的手术时间更长(311对332分钟,P = 0.01)。两组的总体并发症发生率(27%对23%,P = 0.72)、住院时间(6对7,P = 0.10)和病理结果相似。所有手术均无需转为腹腔镜手术。两名非肥胖患者需要转为开放手术。

结论

肥胖患者的机器人直肠癌手术与非肥胖患者同样安全有效。新的机器人平台有助于克服直肠手术中与肥胖相关的限制。

相似文献

1
Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
3
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.肥胖患者的机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜直肠癌手术
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1063-1071. doi: 10.1111/codi.13374.
4
Impact of obesity on operation performed, complications, and long-term outcomes in terms of restoration of intestinal continuity for patients with mid and low rectal cancer.肥胖对中低位直肠癌患者肠连续性恢复手术操作、并发症和长期结局的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):689-97. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182880ffa.
5
[Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].机器人手术与腹腔镜根治性手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):540-544.
6
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:短期手术和功能结局的病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):589-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5708-5. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Does obesity impact postoperative outcomes following robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer?肥胖是否会影响直肠癌机器人辅助手术后的结果?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4886-4892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6247-4. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note.使用达芬奇Xi系统和集成手术台运动进行机器人直肠手术的精准度,技术说明
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):433-436. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0752-7. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
[Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients].[机器人手术与腹腔镜手术对超重和肥胖直肠癌患者行根治性切除的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200116-00027.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the learning curve on the outcomes of robotic surgery in obese patients with rectal cancer.学习曲线对肥胖直肠癌患者机器人手术结局的影响。
Surg Today. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03113-y.
2
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高危患者结直肠癌的机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Apr 8;29(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03141-3.
3
The perioperative results of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
肥胖患者直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03781-7.
4
Influence of BMI on robotic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体重指数对机器人直肠癌手术的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 3;19(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02211-2.
5
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for visceral obesity in mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌合并内脏肥胖的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 20;18(1):178. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01945-3.
6
Impact of obesity on patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand.肥胖对在澳大利亚和新西兰接受直肠癌手术的患者的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 8;38(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04447-0.
7
Relationship between body mass index and short-term postoperative prognosis in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.体重指数与结直肠癌手术患者术后短期预后的关系。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Apr 26;11(12):2766-2779. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2766.
8
Assessing the role of robotic proctectomy in obese patients: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.评估肥胖患者行机器人直肠切除术的作用:一项当代 NSQIP 分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01380-2. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者与机器人结直肠手术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Sep 21;4(6):1042-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50335.
10
The impact of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.机器人结直肠手术治疗肥胖患者的影响:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3558-3566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07000-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25.