• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。

Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5
PMID:29253373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5943037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abortion can help women to control their fertility and is an important component of health care for women. Although women in the USA who live further from an abortion clinic are less likely to obtain an abortion than women who live closer to an abortion clinic, no national study has examined inequality in access to abortion and whether inequality has increased as the number of abortion clinics has declined.

METHODS

For this analysis, we obtained data on abortion clinics for 2000, 2011, and 2014 from the Guttmacher Institute's Abortion Provider Census. Block groups and the percentage of women aged 15-44 years by census tract were obtained from the US Census Bureau. Distance to the nearest clinic was calculated for the population-weighted centroid of every block group. We calculated the median distance to an abortion clinic for women in each county and the median and 80th percentile distances for each state by weighting block groups by the number of women of reproductive age (15-44 years).

FINDINGS

In 2014, women in the USA would have had to travel a median distance of 10·79 miles (17·36 km) to reach the nearest abortion clinic, although 20% of women would have had to travel 42·54 miles (68·46 km) or more. We found substantially greater variation within than between states because, even in mostly rural states, women and clinics were concentrated in urban areas. We identified spatial disparities in abortion access, which were broadly unchanged, at least as far back as 2000.

INTERPRETATION

We showed substantial and persistent spatial disparities in access to abortion in the USA. These results contribute to an emerging literature documenting similar disparities in other high-income countries.

FUNDING

An anonymous grant to the Guttmacher Institute.

摘要

背景

堕胎可以帮助女性控制生育,是女性保健的重要组成部分。尽管美国居住在离堕胎诊所较远的女性获得堕胎的可能性低于居住在离堕胎诊所较近的女性,但没有全国性的研究调查过堕胎机会方面的不平等现象,也没有研究过随着堕胎诊所数量的减少,不平等现象是否有所增加。

方法

在这项分析中,我们从盖特马赫研究所(Guttmacher Institute)的堕胎提供者普查(Abortion Provider Census)中获得了 2000 年、2011 年和 2014 年的堕胎诊所数据。街区组和每个普查区 15-44 岁女性的比例从美国人口普查局获得。为每个街区组的人口加权质心计算到最近诊所的距离。我们按生育年龄(15-44 岁)的女性人数对街区组进行加权,计算了每个县的女性到达最近堕胎诊所的中位数距离,以及每个州的中位数和 80 百分位距离。

发现

2014 年,美国女性到达最近堕胎诊所的平均距离将达到 10.79 英里(17.36 公里),尽管 20%的女性将不得不行驶 42.54 英里(68.46 公里)或更远。我们发现,州内的差异远远大于州际之间的差异,因为即使在以农村为主的州,女性和诊所也集中在城市地区。我们发现堕胎机会方面存在广泛的空间差异,至少从 2000 年以来,这种差异基本保持不变。

解释

我们在美国堕胎机会方面存在显著且持续的空间差异。这些结果为其他高收入国家记录类似差异的新兴文献做出了贡献。

资助

盖特马赫研究所的一笔匿名赠款。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/ca171878e719/nihms957980f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/20848ea33746/nihms957980f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/cb08c9b600fe/nihms957980f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/ca171878e719/nihms957980f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/20848ea33746/nihms957980f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/cb08c9b600fe/nihms957980f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/088c/5943037/ca171878e719/nihms957980f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
2
Medication abortion use among low-income and rural Texans before and during state-imposed restrictions and after FDA-updated labeling.在得克萨斯州实施限制以及美国食品药品监督管理局更新标签前后,低收入和农村得克萨斯州居民药物流产使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):236.e1-236.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion.旅行距离与最近堕胎设施的关联与堕胎率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115530. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15530.
5
How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?2008 年,美国女性为获得堕胎服务而出行的距离有多远?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Aug;22(8):706-13. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4283. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
6
Abortion services in rural Washington State, 1983-1984 to 1993-1994: availability and outcomes.1983 - 1984年至1993 - 1994年华盛顿州农村地区的堕胎服务:可及性与结果
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):241-5.
7
Implications for women of Louisiana's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.路易斯安那州要求堕胎提供者具备医院准入特权的法律对女性的影响。
Contraception. 2015 May;91(5):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
8
Factors hindering access to abortion services.阻碍获得堕胎服务的因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):54-9, 87.
9
Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California.加利福尼亚州为医疗补助覆盖的堕胎护理所行进的距离。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2241-0.
10
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.农村环境对意外怀孕后女性决策及妊娠选择的影响:一项系统综述
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251348986. doi: 10.1177/17455057251348986. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Geographic Realities of Abortion Access in Texas: Exploring the Heterogeneous Effects of Texas Senate Bill 8 with Mobile Phone Data.德克萨斯州堕胎服务获取的地理现实:利用手机数据探究德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案的异质效应
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025;44(3):29. doi: 10.1007/s11113-025-09948-0. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
US reproductive health and rights: beyond the global gag rule.美国的生殖健康与权利:超越全球禁言规则
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Mar;2(3):e122-e123. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30035-X. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014.2012年至2014年德克萨斯州到最近医疗机构的距离变化与堕胎情况
JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):437-439. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17026.
3
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.2014年美国的堕胎发生率与服务可及性
理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
4
Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study.美国 2021 年(多布斯案前)危机怀孕中心和堕胎设施的空间分析:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 6;10:e60001. doi: 10.2196/60001.
5
Factors influencing abortion care-seeking outside of formal healthcare settings: lived experiences from Rwandan young women.影响在正规医疗机构之外寻求堕胎服务的因素:来自卢旺达年轻女性的生活经历。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03410-7.
6
The experiences and perspectives of abortion seekers who travel for care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.寻求堕胎者的经验和观点:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 11;10(10):CD015565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015565.
7
Protocol for exploring pathways to equitable outcomes in post-stroke aphasia and dysphagia.探索脑卒中后失语症和吞咽障碍中公平结局途径的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0308963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308963. eCollection 2024.
8
The Impact of Rural Environments on Reproductive Autonomy Among Women in Appalachia: A Qualitative Analysis.阿巴拉契亚地区农村环境对女性生殖自主权的影响:一项定性分析
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Jun 3;36(3):273-286. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2360730. eCollection 2024.
9
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.多布斯诉杰克逊案对患者和医疗保健提供者的公共卫生和临床影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024.
10
Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.医疗补助在减轻堕胎部分经济负担方面的作用:2021-2022 年堕胎患者调查结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):244-254. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12250. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2013.《2013 年美国堕胎监测报告》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Nov 25;65(12):1-44. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6512a1.
5
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
7
Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.在得克萨斯州一项限制性法律导致诊所关闭后不久,女性寻求堕胎护理的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review.发达国家妇女获得孕早期堕胎服务的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015 Jul;41(3):170-80. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100862.
9
Did increasing use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa?爱荷华州高效避孕措施使用的增加是否导致了堕胎率的下降?
Contraception. 2015 Feb;91(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 613: Increasing access to abortion.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见第 613 号:增加堕胎机会。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):1060-1065. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000456326.88857.31.