• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。

Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.

机构信息

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2018.7496
PMID:31282804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6919239/
Abstract

Greater distance to abortion facilities is associated with greater out-of-pocket costs, emergency room follow-up care, negative mental health, and delayed care among U.S. abortion patients. However, the distance U.S. abortion patients travel has not been reported since 2008, and no study has examined reasons abortion patients choose the particular facility where they obtain their abortion. We analyzed data from the 2014 Abortion Patient Survey and Abortion Provider Census to report abortion patients' one-way travel from their resident zip code to their abortion clinic, whether they went to the closest clinic, and reasons for facility choice. We report unadjusted and adjusted associations of patients' characteristics with travel distance and differences in average travel distance by abortion patients' reported reasons for choosing their facility. In 2014, 65% of abortion patients traveled less than 25 miles one-way, 17% traveled 25-49 miles, and 18% traveled more than 50 miles. Abortion patients who were white, college-educated, U.S.-born, ≥12 weeks pregnant, and lived outside metropolitan areas were more likely to travel farther. Nearly half of abortion patients went to their nearest provider and 32% chose their facility because it was the closest. These results indicate that travel distance is an important determinant of abortion care access in the United States. Nearly, one-fifth of U.S. abortion patients traveled more than 50 miles one-way and the most common reason reported for clinic choice was that it was the closest.

摘要

距离堕胎设施较远与患者自付费用增加、需要急诊后续护理、心理健康状况恶化以及堕胎护理延迟有关。然而,自 2008 年以来,一直没有报告美国堕胎患者的出行距离,也没有研究调查过堕胎患者选择特定堕胎机构的原因。我们分析了 2014 年堕胎患者调查和堕胎服务提供者普查的数据,以报告堕胎患者从居住邮编到堕胎诊所的单程旅行距离、他们是否去了最近的诊所,以及选择堕胎服务的原因。我们报告了未调整和调整后的患者特征与旅行距离的关联,以及按堕胎患者选择其设施的原因报告的平均旅行距离的差异。2014 年,65%的堕胎患者单程旅行距离小于 25 英里,17%的患者旅行距离为 25-49 英里,18%的患者旅行距离超过 50 英里。白人、受过大学教育、土生土长的美国公民、怀孕 12 周以上且居住在大都市地区以外的堕胎患者更有可能旅行更远。近一半的堕胎患者去了最近的服务提供者,32%的人选择他们的诊所是因为它是最近的。这些结果表明,旅行距离是美国堕胎护理获取的一个重要决定因素。近五分之一的美国堕胎患者单程旅行超过 50 英里,报告的最常见的选择诊所的原因是它是最近的。

相似文献

1
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
Travel for Abortion Services in Alabama and Delays Obtaining Care.阿拉巴马州堕胎服务旅行和获得护理的延迟。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 12.
3
How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?2008 年,美国女性为获得堕胎服务而出行的距离有多远?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Aug;22(8):706-13. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4283. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Medication abortion use among low-income and rural Texans before and during state-imposed restrictions and after FDA-updated labeling.在得克萨斯州实施限制以及美国食品药品监督管理局更新标签前后,低收入和农村得克萨斯州居民药物流产使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):236.e1-236.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Access to Abortion Services in Tennessee: Does Distance Traveled and Geographic Location Influence Return for a Second Appointment as Required by the Mandatory Waiting Period Policy?田纳西州的堕胎服务获取情况:旅行距离和地理位置是否会影响按照强制等待期政策要求再次预约就诊的情况?
Health Soc Work. 2019 Feb 1;44(1):13-21. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hly039.
6
Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion.旅行距离与最近堕胎设施的关联与堕胎率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115530. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15530.
7
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
The Association Between Intimate Partner Violence and Distance Traveled to Access Abortion in a Nationally Representative Sample of Abortion Patients.在全国堕胎患者的代表性样本中,亲密伴侣暴力与堕胎出行距离之间的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP663-NP689. doi: 10.1177/0886260517734861. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California.加利福尼亚州为医疗补助覆盖的堕胎护理所行进的距离。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2241-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Abortion care preferences and trade-offs when traveling out-of-state for facility-based services: findings from a discrete choice experiment.前往州外接受机构化服务时的堕胎护理偏好与权衡:离散选择实验的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12005-9.
2
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.州内和州外堕胎护理的灾难性医疗支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444146. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146.
4
Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study.美国 2021 年(多布斯案前)危机怀孕中心和堕胎设施的空间分析:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 6;10:e60001. doi: 10.2196/60001.
5
Distance Traveled for Abortion at a North Carolina Tertiary Care Center Following Restrictive Legislation.北卡罗来纳州一家三级保健中心在实施限制堕胎立法后堕胎的旅行距离。
N C Med J. 2023 May;84(3):194-197. doi: 10.18043/001c.74509.
6
Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.医疗补助在减轻堕胎部分经济负担方面的作用:2021-2022 年堕胎患者调查结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):244-254. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12250. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
7
The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.第三方授权要求对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律和健康证据的综合分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2065. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16307-1.
8
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.得克萨斯州 2021 年堕胎禁令后,堕胎患者关于在哪里获得州外护理的决策。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
Second-Trimester Dilation and Evacuation: A Simulation-Based Team Training Curriculum.中孕期扩张刮宫术:基于模拟的团队培训课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2023 Aug 15;19:11336. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11336. eCollection 2023.
10
The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.罗诉韦德案的终结:对女性心理健康与护理的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 5;14:1087045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication abortion: Potential for improved patient access through pharmacies.药物流产:通过药店改善患者获取途径的潜力。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4):377-381. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Distance Traveled for an Abortion and Source of Care After Abortion.堕胎的行程距离及堕胎后的护理来源。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):616-624. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002188.
4
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
The Maternal Health Compact.孕产妇健康契约
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1304-1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700485.
6
Abortion Facility Closings and Abortion Rates in Texas.德克萨斯州堕胎机构关闭与堕胎率
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017700944. doi: 10.1177/0046958017700944.
7
Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014.2012年至2014年德克萨斯州到最近医疗机构的距离变化与堕胎情况
JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):437-439. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17026.
8
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.2014年美国的堕胎发生率与服务可及性
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
Increasing Access to Abortion With Telemedicine.通过远程医疗增加堕胎机会。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):585-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0573.
10
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.