Khorasanynejad Rose, Norouzi Alireza, Roshandel Gholamreza, Besharat Sima
Assistant of cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Gastroentrologist, Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;9(4):212-217. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.76.
BACKGROUND Ideal bowel preparation regimen for a suitable colonoscopy should be safe, and well tolerated, and should rapidly clear gastrointestinal tract. Soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most common cleansing drug and Senna or C-Lax (Cassia angustifolia Vahl) is an alternative herbal one. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of PEG and C-lax in bowel preparation. METHODS In this randomized double blind trial (registry number in IRCT.ir: IRCT201601161264N7), 320 patients were randomly assigned in PEG or C-lax groups. PEG solution was prepared from 5×70 gr sachets in 20×250cc water (250 ml every 15 minutes), prescribed 24h before the colonoscopy. In the other group 3×60 ml C-lax syrup glasses (each containing 90 mg senozid B) was given in two divided doses (1.5 glasses of 250cc every 12 hours), 24h before the colonoscopy. Ottawa score was used to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. Chi-square test, Student t test, MannWhitney test and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Of these patients with the mean (SD) age of 50 (15.16) years, 162 (50.8%) were men. Mean (SD) Ottawa score was 2.57 (0.2) and 3.15 (0.31) in the PEG and C-lax group, respectively (p value = 0.81). Multivariate analysis showed that less opium consumption (p < 0.001) and higher educational level (p =0.005) were associated with better bowel preparation. CONCLUSION C-Lax is non-inferior to PEG solution in cleansing colon. The quality of bowel preparation was lower in opium consumers and better in those with higher educational level.
背景 适合结肠镜检查的理想肠道准备方案应安全且耐受性良好,并应能迅速清洁胃肠道。可溶性聚乙二醇(PEG)是最常用的清肠药物,番泻叶或C-Lax(狭叶番泻)是另一种草本药物。本研究旨在比较PEG和C-Lax在肠道准备中的效果。
方法 在这项随机双盲试验(IRCT.ir注册编号:IRCT201601161264N7)中,320例患者被随机分为PEG组或C-Lax组。PEG溶液由5包70克的药包溶于20×250毫升水中配制而成(每15分钟服用250毫升),于结肠镜检查前24小时服用。另一组在结肠镜检查前24小时给予3杯60毫升的C-Lax糖浆(每杯含90毫克番泻苷B),分两次服用(每12小时服用1.5杯250毫升)。采用渥太华评分来评估肠道准备质量。使用卡方检验、学生t检验、曼-惠特尼检验和多变量分析来分析数据。
结果 这些患者的平均(标准差)年龄为50(15.16)岁,其中162例(50.8%)为男性。PEG组和C-Lax组的平均(标准差)渥太华评分分别为2.57(0.2)和3.15(0.31)(p值 = 0.81)。多变量分析显示,较少的鸦片摄入量(p < 0.001)和较高的教育水平(p = 0.005)与更好的肠道准备相关。
结论 C-Lax在清洁结肠方面不劣于PEG溶液。鸦片使用者的肠道准备质量较低,而教育水平较高者的肠道准备质量较好。