Sher David J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Outcomes and Health Services Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Front Oncol. 2017 Dec 4;7:281. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00281. eCollection 2017.
The local management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer is controversial. Although definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered a standard-of-care in the curative management of the disease, inadequate local control outcomes have led to various treatment strategies that incorporate surgical resection. Surgery alone has long been recognized as insufficient for this stage, and thus neoadjuvant strategies have been developed to treat micrometastatic disease and increase the probability of a complete resection. The optimal induction strategy has not yet been defined, however, with arguments favoring either preoperative chemotherapy or CRT. In this article, the data supporting the use of neoadjuvant CRT and the randomized literature comparing the two approaches will be reviewed. The article will conclude with summary comparisons of these induction paradigms.
Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌的局部治疗存在争议。尽管根治性放化疗(CRT)被认为是该疾病根治性治疗的标准疗法,但局部控制效果不佳导致了各种包含手术切除的治疗策略。长期以来,单纯手术被认为对该阶段治疗不足,因此已开发出新辅助策略来治疗微转移疾病并提高完全切除的概率。然而,最佳诱导策略尚未确定,存在支持术前化疗或CRT的不同观点。在本文中,将回顾支持使用新辅助CRT的数据以及比较这两种方法的随机文献。本文将以这些诱导模式的总结比较作为结论。