Faramarzi Salar, Moradi Mohammadreza, Abedi Ahmad
Department of Children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Jun;47(3):627-640. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9545-4.
The present study aimed to develop the thinking maps training package and compare its training effect with the thinking maps method on the reading performance of second and fifth grade of elementary school male dyslexic students. For this mixed method exploratory study, from among the above mentioned grades' students in Isfahan, 90 students who met the inclusion criteria were selected by multistage sampling and randomly assigned into six experimental and control groups. The data were collected by reading and dyslexia test and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition. The results of covariance analysis indicated a significant difference between the reading performance of the experimental (thinking maps training package and thinking maps method groups) and control groups ([Formula: see text]). Moreover, there were significant differences between the thinking maps training package group and thinking maps method group in some of the subtests ([Formula: see text]). It can be concluded that thinking maps training package and the thinking maps method exert a positive influence on the reading performance of dyslexic students; therefore, thinking maps can be used as an effective training and treatment method.
本研究旨在开发思维导图训练包,并将其训练效果与思维导图方法对小学二、五年级男性阅读障碍学生阅读表现的影响进行比较。对于这项混合方法探索性研究,从伊斯法罕上述年级的学生中,通过多阶段抽样选取了90名符合纳入标准的学生,并随机分为六个实验组和对照组。数据通过阅读和阅读障碍测试以及韦氏儿童智力量表第四版收集。协方差分析结果表明,实验组(思维导图训练包组和思维导图方法组)与对照组的阅读表现存在显著差异([公式:见原文])。此外,在一些子测试中,思维导图训练包组和思维导图方法组之间也存在显著差异([公式:见原文])。可以得出结论,思维导图训练包和思维导图方法对阅读障碍学生的阅读表现有积极影响;因此,思维导图可作为一种有效的训练和治疗方法。