Patel Tapan P, Prajna N Venkatesh, Farsiu Sina, Valikodath Nita G, Niziol Leslie M, Dudeja Lakshey, Kim Kyeong Hwan, Woodward Maria A
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Cornea and Refractive Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Cornea. 2018 Mar;37(3):331-339. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001488.
To assess variability in corneal ulcer measurements between ophthalmologists and reduce clinician-dependent variability using semiautomated segmentation of the ulcer from photographs.
Three ophthalmologists measured 50 patients' eyes for epithelial defects (EDs) and the stromal infiltrate (SI) size using slit-lamp (SL) calipers. SL photographs were obtained. An algorithm was developed for semiautomatic segmenting of the ED and SI in the photographs. Semiautomatic segmentation was repeated 3 times by different users (2 ophthalmologists and 1 trainee). Clinically significant variability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the percentage of pairwise measurements differing by ≥0.5 mm. Semiautomatic segmentation measurements were compared with manual delineation of the image by a corneal specialist (gold standard) using Dice similarity coefficients.
Ophthalmologists' reliability in measurements by SL calipers had an ICC from 0.84 to 0.88 between examiners. Measurements by semiautomatic segmentation had an ICC from 0.96 to 0.98. SL measures of ulcers by clinical versus semiautomatic segmentation measures differed by ≥0.5 mm in 24% to 38% versus 8% to 28% (ED height); 30% to 52% versus 12% to 34% (ED width); 26% to 38% versus 10% to 32% (SI height); and 38% to 58% versus 14% to 34% (SI width), respectively. Average Dice similarity coefficients between manual and repeated semiautomatic segmentation ranged from 0.83 to 0.86 for the ED and 0.78 to 0.83 for the SI.
Variability exists when measuring corneal ulcers, even among ophthalmologists. Photography and computerized methods for quantifying the ulcer size could reduce variability while remaining accurate and impact quantitative measurement endpoints.
评估眼科医生之间角膜溃疡测量的变异性,并通过对照片中溃疡进行半自动分割来减少临床医生依赖的变异性。
三位眼科医生使用裂隙灯卡尺测量了50例患者眼睛的上皮缺损(ED)和基质浸润(SI)大小。获取了裂隙灯照片。开发了一种算法用于对照片中的ED和SI进行半自动分割。不同用户(2位眼科医生和1名实习生)对半自动分割重复进行3次。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和相差≥0.5毫米的成对测量百分比评估具有临床意义的变异性。将半自动分割测量结果与角膜专科医生对图像的手动描绘(金标准)使用骰子相似系数进行比较。
检查者之间使用裂隙灯卡尺测量时,眼科医生的可靠性ICC为0.84至0.88。半自动分割测量的ICC为0.96至0.98。临床测量与半自动分割测量的溃疡,ED高度相差≥0.5毫米的比例分别为24%至38%和8%至28%;ED宽度为30%至52%和12%至34%;SI高度为26%至38%和10%至32%;SI宽度为38%至58%和14%至34%。手动分割与重复半自动分割之间的平均骰子相似系数,ED为0.83至0.86,SI为0.78至0.83。
即使在眼科医生中,测量角膜溃疡时也存在变异性。用于量化溃疡大小的摄影和计算机化方法可以减少变异性,同时保持准确性并影响定量测量终点。