• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛自我效能问卷在颈痛障碍患者中的有效性和反应性。

Validity and Responsiveness of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Patients With Neck Pain Disorders.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Mar;48(3):204-216. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7605. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

DOI:10.2519/jospt.2018.7605
PMID:29257925
Abstract

Study Design Longitudinal clinimetric study. Background Pain self-efficacy predicts poor recovery and mediates the relationship between pain and disability in patients with neck pain disorders (NPDs). The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a frequently used instrument to measure pain self-efficacy; however, its measurement properties have never been evaluated in a group of patients with NPDs. Objectives This study aimed to assess validity and responsiveness of the PSEQ in patients with NPDs. Methods Patients with NPDs (n = 161) were included. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Twelve hypotheses on expected correlations with other instruments were formulated a priori to assess construct validity. Responsiveness was evaluated in 146 patients with NPDs who underwent multimodal rehabilitation by testing 12 hypotheses on expected effect sizes, area under the curve, and correlations with change in other instruments. Results Factor analyses showed that the PSEQ is a unidimensional instrument with moderate construct validity and responsiveness (50% to 75% of hypotheses met). Validity was consistent when analyzed separately for patients with whiplash-associated disorders and idiopathic neck pain, and responsiveness was better in patients with idiopathic neck pain. Conclusion The PSEQ is a unidimensional measure of pain self-efficacy in patients with NPDs, as found by previous studies in other populations. Nevertheless, in contrast with previous studies, its construct validity and responsiveness were found to be suboptimal in NPDs, suggesting that the content validity of the PSEQ and of the comparator instruments used in this study should be better assessed. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(3):204-216. Epub 19 Dec 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7605.

摘要

研究设计

纵向临床计量研究。背景:疼痛自我效能预测恢复不良,并在颈痛障碍(NPD)患者的疼痛和残疾之间起中介作用。疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)是一种常用的测量疼痛自我效能的工具,但它在 NPD 患者群体中的测量特性从未得到过评估。目的:本研究旨在评估 PSEQ 在 NPD 患者中的有效性和反应性。方法:纳入了 NPD 患者(n=161)。采用验证性和探索性因子分析来评估结构有效性。预先提出了 12 个关于与其他工具预期相关性的假设,以评估构念有效性。在接受多模式康复治疗的 146 名 NPD 患者中评估反应性,通过测试 12 个关于预期效应大小、曲线下面积和与其他工具变化相关性的假设。结果:因子分析显示,PSEQ 是一种具有中等构念有效性和反应性的单维工具(50%至 75%的假设得到满足)。在分析与挥鞭样损伤相关的障碍和特发性颈痛患者时,有效性是一致的,而在特发性颈痛患者中,反应性更好。结论:PSEQ 是一种在 NPD 患者中测量疼痛自我效能的多维工具,与之前在其他人群中进行的研究结果一致。然而,与之前的研究不同,它在 NPD 中的构念有效性和反应性被认为是不理想的,这表明 PSEQ 的内容有效性和本研究中使用的比较工具的内容有效性应该得到更好的评估。美国骨科运动医学杂志 2018;48(3):204-216。2017 年 12 月 19 日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7605.

相似文献

1
Validity and Responsiveness of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Patients With Neck Pain Disorders.疼痛自我效能问卷在颈痛障碍患者中的有效性和反应性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Mar;48(3):204-216. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7605. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛自我效能问卷及其简表的反应性和最小重要变化
J Pain. 2016 Jun;17(6):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Neck Disorders: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.用于颈部疾病的患者报告结局测量:系统评价概述。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Oct;48(10):775-788. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8131. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire - Hebrew version.疼痛自我效能问卷的跨文化适应性、信度和效度 - 希伯来语版。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Apr;64:102749. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102749. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
5
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale.日语版颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表的信度、效度及反应度
J Orthop Sci. 2011 Jul;16(4):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0053-3. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
6
Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.意大利版颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表(NPDS-I)的研制:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):E429-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c2b0.
7
Scale Shortening and Decrease in Measurement Precision: Analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Its Short Forms in an Italian-Speaking Population With Neck Pain Disorders.量表缩短与测量精度降低:意大利语人群颈项疼痛障碍患者疼痛自我效能问卷及其简化式分析。
Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab039.
8
Are People With Whiplash-Associated Neck Pain Different From People With Nonspecific Neck Pain?挥鞭样损伤相关性颈部疼痛患者与非特异性颈部疼痛患者有区别吗?
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;46(10):894-901. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6588. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
9
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation into Italian and Assessment of Its Measurement Properties.疼痛自我效能问卷:跨文化适应为意大利语及其测量属性评估
Pain Pract. 2015 Nov;15(8):738-47. doi: 10.1111/papr.12242. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
10
Structural and construct validity of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders.急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病成人患者中挥鞭样损伤残疾问卷的结构效度和构建效度
Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol for investigating racial disparities in pain care: a comprehensive integration of patient-level and provider-level mechanisms with dyadic communication processes using a mixed-methods research design.调查疼痛护理中种族差异的研究方案:采用混合方法研究设计,将患者层面和提供者层面的机制与二元沟通流程进行全面整合。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 27;15(3):e090365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090365.
2
Evaluation of long-term outcomes with intrathecal opioid treatment: a comparison utilizing data derived from pain clinic populations in Australia and New Zealand.鞘内注射阿片类药物治疗的长期疗效评估:利用澳大利亚和新西兰疼痛诊所人群数据进行的比较。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 14;6:1527371. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1527371. eCollection 2025.
3
Physical and psychological predictors for persistent and recurrent non-specific neck pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.持续性和复发性非特异性颈部疼痛的身体和心理预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 25;15(2):e094967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094967.
4
Pain Self-efficacy Is Associated With Patient-Reported Function in Individuals With Chronic Hip Pain.疼痛自我效能与慢性髋部疼痛患者报告的功能相关。
JOSPT Open. 2024 Jul;2(3):264-271. doi: 10.2519/josptopen.2024.1021. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.肌肉骨骼疾病人群中疼痛自我效能问卷的测量属性:一项系统评价
Pain Rep. 2021 Dec 21;6(4):e972. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000972. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
6
Development, validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale.哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表意大利语版的开发、效度与信度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Nov 23;19(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2332-z.