Piersma H L
Pine Rest Christian Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI 49508-6999.
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jan;45(1):87-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198901)45:1<87::aid-jclp2270450113>3.0.co;2-7.
Recently, the MCMI-II (Millon, 1987) has been introduced as a successor to the MCMI-I (Millon, 1983). This study evaluated the MCMI-II as a treatment outcome measure for psychiatric inpatients. Ninety-eight patients were tested at admission and discharge with the MCMI-II. Changes in mean MCMI-II scores on the basic and pathological personality scales, as well as the moderate and severe symptom scales, were generally congruent with findings from a previous outcome study with the MCMI-I (Piersma, 1986a). However, several differences between the MCMI-II and MCMI-I were noted, which suggests that the MCMI-II will need to be cross-validated as an instrument distinct from the MCMI-I.
最近，米隆临床多轴问卷第二版（MCMI-II，米隆，1987年）作为米隆临床多轴问卷第一版（MCMI-I，米隆，1983年）的后续版本被引入。本研究评估了MCMI-II作为精神科住院患者治疗结果测量工具的情况。98名患者在入院和出院时接受了MCMI-II测试。MCMI-II基本人格量表、病理人格量表以及中度和重度症状量表的平均得分变化，总体上与之前一项关于MCMI-I的结果研究（皮尔斯马，1986a）的结果一致。然而，MCMI-II和MCMI-I之间存在一些差异，这表明MCMI-II需要作为一种与MCMI-I不同的工具进行交叉验证。
