Piersma H L
Pine Rest Christian Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI 49508-6999.
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;45(5):781-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<781::aid-jclp2270450514>3.0.co;2-6.
The MCMI-II (Millon, 1987) has been introduced recently as a successor to the MCMI-I (Millon, 1983). Because numerous revisions have been made in the MCMI-II, it will need to be cross-validated as an instrument distinct from the MCMI-I. The purposes of this study were to: (1) cross-validate the test-retest stabilities for MCMI-II personality and symptom scales; and (2) compare and contrast the MCMI-II and MCMI-I in regard to scale stability. The MCMI-II was administered to 98 psychiatric inpatients at admission and discharge. Results were generally consistent with the data reported by Millon (1987), in that the basic personality scales evidenced the greatest stability, the pathological personality scales somewhat lower stability, and the symptom scales the least stability. Compared to the MCMI-I, test-retest coefficients were generally higher for the MCMI-II.
MCMI-II(米隆,1987年)最近作为MCMI-I(米隆,1983年)的后续版本被引入。由于MCMI-II进行了大量修订,因此需要作为一种与MCMI-I不同的工具进行交叉验证。本研究的目的是:(1)对MCMI-II人格和症状量表的重测稳定性进行交叉验证;(2)在量表稳定性方面比较和对比MCMI-II和MCMI-I。对98名精神科住院患者在入院时和出院时进行了MCMI-II测试。结果总体上与米隆(1987年)报告的数据一致,即基本人格量表的稳定性最高,病理人格量表的稳定性略低,症状量表的稳定性最低。与MCMI-I相比,MCMI-II的重测系数总体上更高。