• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MCMI-II(明尼苏达多项人格问卷第二版)在精神科住院患者中的稳定性。

The stability of the MCMI-II for psychiatric inpatients.

作者信息

Piersma H L

机构信息

Pine Rest Christian Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI 49508-6999.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;45(5):781-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<781::aid-jclp2270450514>3.0.co;2-6.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<781::aid-jclp2270450514>3.0.co;2-6
PMID:2808735
Abstract

The MCMI-II (Millon, 1987) has been introduced recently as a successor to the MCMI-I (Millon, 1983). Because numerous revisions have been made in the MCMI-II, it will need to be cross-validated as an instrument distinct from the MCMI-I. The purposes of this study were to: (1) cross-validate the test-retest stabilities for MCMI-II personality and symptom scales; and (2) compare and contrast the MCMI-II and MCMI-I in regard to scale stability. The MCMI-II was administered to 98 psychiatric inpatients at admission and discharge. Results were generally consistent with the data reported by Millon (1987), in that the basic personality scales evidenced the greatest stability, the pathological personality scales somewhat lower stability, and the symptom scales the least stability. Compared to the MCMI-I, test-retest coefficients were generally higher for the MCMI-II.

摘要

MCMI-II(米隆,1987年)最近作为MCMI-I(米隆,1983年)的后续版本被引入。由于MCMI-II进行了大量修订,因此需要作为一种与MCMI-I不同的工具进行交叉验证。本研究的目的是:(1)对MCMI-II人格和症状量表的重测稳定性进行交叉验证;(2)在量表稳定性方面比较和对比MCMI-II和MCMI-I。对98名精神科住院患者在入院时和出院时进行了MCMI-II测试。结果总体上与米隆(1987年)报告的数据一致,即基本人格量表的稳定性最高,病理人格量表的稳定性略低,症状量表的稳定性最低。与MCMI-I相比,MCMI-II的重测系数总体上更高。

相似文献

1
The stability of the MCMI-II for psychiatric inpatients.MCMI-II(明尼苏达多项人格问卷第二版)在精神科住院患者中的稳定性。
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;45(5):781-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<781::aid-jclp2270450514>3.0.co;2-6.
2
The MCMI-II as a treatment outcome measure for psychiatric inpatients.作为精神科住院患者治疗结果衡量指标的米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)。
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jan;45(1):87-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198901)45:1<87::aid-jclp2270450113>3.0.co;2-7.
3
The stability of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for psychiatric inpatients.用于精神科住院患者的米隆临床多轴问卷的稳定性。
J Pers Assess. 1986 Summer;50(2):193-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5002_5.
4
Retest reliability of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory.米隆临床多轴问卷的重测信度。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):202-8. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674059.
5
Personality disorders among depressed outpatients as identified by the MCMI.
J Clin Psychol. 1990 May;46(3):277-84. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199005)46:3<277::aid-jclp2270460305>3.0.co;2-i.
6
An examination of the relationship between personality patterns and symptom/mood patterns.对人格模式与症状/情绪模式之间关系的研究。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Oct;49(5):552-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4905_18.
7
Issues in the assessment of personality disorder and substance abuse using the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II).使用米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI-II)评估人格障碍和物质滥用问题。
J Clin Psychol. 1995 May;51(3):415-21. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199505)51:3<415::aid-jclp2270510316>3.0.co;2-6.
8
Relationship between the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory and the Millon-II: value of scales for Aggressive and Self-defeating personalities in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.米隆临床多轴问卷与米隆第二版之间的关系:创伤后应激障碍中攻击型和自我挫败型人格量表的价值。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 1):867-79. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.867.
9
Stability of the MCMI among depressed psychiatric outpatients.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):209-18. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674060.
10
The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) as a treatment outcome measure for psychiatric inpatients.米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)作为精神科住院患者治疗效果的衡量指标。
J Clin Psychol. 1986 May;42(3):493-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198605)42:3<493::aid-jclp2270420316>3.0.co;2-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the temporal stability of self-report and interview assessed personality disorder.比较自评和访谈评估人格障碍的时间稳定性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):670-80. doi: 10.1037/a0022647.