Schultz Susan E, Glazier Richard H
Affiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Schultz, Glazier); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2017 Dec 19;5(4):E856-E863. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170083.
Given the changing landscape of primary care, there may be fewer primary care physicians available to provide a broad range of services to patients of all age groups and health conditions. We sought to identify physicians with comprehensive primary care practices in Ontario using administrative data, investigating how many and what proportion of primary care physicians provided comprehensive primary care and how this changed over time.
We identified the pool of active primary care physicians in linked population-based databases for Ontario from 1992/93 to 2014/15. After excluding those who saw patients fewer than 44 days per year, we identified physicians as providing comprehensive care if more than half of their services were for core primary care and if these services fell into at least 7 of 22 activity areas. Physicians with 50% or less of their services for core primary care but with more than 50% in a single location or type of service were identified as being in focused practice.
In 2014/15, there were 12 891 physicians in the primary care pool: 1254 (9.7%) worked fewer than 44 days per year, 1619 (12.6%) were in focused practice, and 1009 (7.8%) could not be classified. The proportion in comprehensive practice ranged from 67.5% to 74.9% between 1992/93 and 2014/15, with a peak in 2002/03 and relative stability from 2009/10 to 2014/15. Over this period, there was an increase of 8.8% in population per comprehensive primary care physician.
We found that just over two-thirds of primary care physicians provided comprehensive care in 2014/15, which indicates that traditional estimates of the primary care physician workforce may be too high. Although implementation will vary by setting and available data, this approach is likely applicable elsewhere.
鉴于基层医疗格局的变化,可能有更少的基层医疗医生能够为所有年龄组和健康状况的患者提供广泛的服务。我们试图利用行政数据确定安大略省具有全面基层医疗服务的医生,调查提供全面基层医疗服务的基层医疗医生数量及比例,以及这一情况如何随时间变化。
我们在与安大略省基于人群的数据库相链接的数据中,确定了1992/93年至2014/15年期间活跃的基层医疗医生群体。在排除那些每年看诊天数少于44天的医生后,如果医生超过一半的服务是针对核心基层医疗,且这些服务至少涵盖22个活动领域中的7个,我们就将其确定为提供全面医疗服务的医生。那些核心基层医疗服务占比50%或更低,但在单一地点或服务类型中占比超过50%的医生被确定为专注于特定领域的执业医生。
在2014/15年,基层医疗医生群体中有12891名医生:1254名(9.7%)每年工作天数少于44天,1619名(12.6%)专注于特定领域的执业,1009名(7.8%)无法分类。1992/93年至2014/15年期间,全面执业的比例在67.5%至74.9%之间,2002/03年达到峰值,2009/10年至2014/15年相对稳定。在此期间,每万名全面基层医疗医生的人口增加了8.8%。
我们发现,在2014/15年,略超过三分之二的基层医疗医生提供全面医疗服务,这表明对基层医疗医生劳动力的传统估计可能过高。尽管实施情况会因环境和可用数据而异,但这种方法可能适用于其他地方。