Department of Radiology, First affiliated hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 20;23:6019-6025. doi: 10.12659/msm.903929.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM DW MRI) to T1 mapping for characterization of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighteen HAE patients confirmed by surgery were examined with conventional MRI, IVIM DWI MRI with 10 b values (range: 0-1,000 sec/mm²), and longitudinal relaxation time (T1) mapping. Diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and T1 relaxation time were calculated in solid components, perilesional components, and background liver parenchyma of HAE patients. The correlation between T1 relaxation time and IVIM-derived parameters was assessed by using the Pearson correlation test. RESULTS T1 relaxation times were significantly higher in solid components (820.58±331.24 ms) compared to background components (551.52±182.93 ms) of HAE patients (p<0.05). IVIM-derived D values were significantly higher in solid components (1.30±0.28×10^-3 mm²/sec) compared to perilesional components (0.88±0.28×10^-3 mm²/sec) and background liver parenchyma (0.97±0.27×10^-3 mm²/sec) of liver parenchyma. There were significant differences in f values between solid components (13.70±7.66%), perilesional components (23.59±10.73%) and background liver parenchyma (30.78±10.18%). IVIM derived D* values were significantly lower in solid components (14.32±10.85×10^-3 mm²/sec) than in background liver parenchyma (30.06±15.68×10^-3 mm²/sec). Importantly, IVIM-derived f values were significantly correlated with T1 relaxation time: r=-0.337 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Based on our image comparison, IVIM DWI MRI might be better than T1 mapping, and IVIM-derived f values might be a valuable index for characterization of HAE.
本研究旨在比较体素内不相干运动扩散加权磁共振成像(IVIM-DWI MRI)与 T1 mapping 对肝泡型包虫病(HAE)的特征描述。
对 18 例经手术证实的 HAE 患者进行常规 MRI、IVIM DWI MRI(10 个 b 值范围:0-1,000 sec/mm²)和纵向弛豫时间(T1)mapping 检查。计算 HAE 患者实性成分、周边成分和背景肝实质的弥散系数(D)、灌注分数(f)、假性弥散系数(D*)和 T1 弛豫时间。采用 Pearson 相关检验评估 T1 弛豫时间与 IVIM 衍生参数之间的相关性。
HAE 患者实性成分的 T1 弛豫时间(820.58±331.24 ms)明显高于背景成分(551.52±182.93 ms)(p<0.05)。IVIM 衍生的 D 值在实性成分(1.30±0.28×10^-3 mm²/sec)明显高于周边成分(0.88±0.28×10^-3 mm²/sec)和背景肝实质(0.97±0.27×10^-3 mm²/sec)。实性成分的 f 值在实性成分(13.70±7.66%)、周边成分(23.59±10.73%)和背景肝实质(30.78±10.18%)之间存在显著差异。IVIM 衍生的 D*值在实性成分(14.32±10.85×10^-3 mm²/sec)明显低于背景肝实质(30.06±15.68×10^-3 mm²/sec)。重要的是,IVIM 衍生的 f 值与 T1 弛豫时间显著相关:r=-0.337(p<0.05)。
基于我们的图像比较,IVIM-DWI MRI 可能优于 T1 mapping,IVIM 衍生的 f 值可能是 HAE 特征描述的一个有价值的指标。