• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和专业人员对西班牙家庭肠内营养产品属性的偏好。一项离散选择实验。

Patients' and professionals' preferences in terms of the attributes of home enteral nutrition products in Spain. A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición. Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga/Universidad de Málaga, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain.

Hospital Universitario de Santiago, A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;72(2):272-280. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0023-8. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41430-017-0023-8
PMID:29259337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5842881/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To elicit and compare preferences in terms of the attributes of home enteral nutrition (HEN) among patients and physicians, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

SUBJECTS/METHODS: A DCE comprising eight choice scenarios, with six HEN attributes (tolerability, adaptation to comorbidities, nutrition and calories, handling, connections and information; two levels each) was designed. The Relative Importance (RI) for patients and physicians of each attribute was estimated. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as additional questions (n = 8) were compiled to analyze possible explanatory variables and other preferences.

RESULTS

A total of 148 HEN patients (71 needing caregivers to answer on their behalf) and 114 physicians completed the DCE. The most important attributes for patients were adaptation to comorbidities (33% RI), tolerability (33% RI), and nutrition and calories (26% RI). Significantly, younger patients had stronger preferences for tolerability whereas elderly ones (≥75 years) were more concerned about handling. In comparison, physicians gave a higher RI to tolerability, and nutrition and calories compared to patients (p = 0.002). Overall, a higher percentage of physicians answered that HEN characteristics such as easy-handling bags (85.1 vs. 64.9%; p = 0.001), container material (69.3 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.003) or reusable containers (79.8 vs. 70.3%; p = 0.01) were "important" or "very important" compared to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that although patients and physicians have a similar perception about the relevance of different HEN attributes, the relative weight given to each one varies between them. Therefore, both points of view should be considered when choosing a HEN product in order to improve patients' satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景/目的:使用离散选择实验(DCE)来引出并比较患者和医生对家庭肠内营养(HEN)属性的偏好。

受试者/方法:设计了一个包含 8 个选择场景的 DCE,其中 HEN 属性(耐受性、适应合并症、营养和热量、处理、连接和信息;每个属性两个水平)有 6 个。估计了每个属性对患者和医生的相对重要性(RI)。编制了社会人口统计学和临床变量以及其他问题(n=8),以分析可能的解释变量和其他偏好。

结果

共有 148 名 HEN 患者(71 名需要护理人员代表他们回答)和 114 名医生完成了 DCE。对患者而言,最重要的属性是适应合并症(33% RI)、耐受性(33% RI)和营养和热量(26% RI)。值得注意的是,年轻患者对耐受性的偏好更强,而老年患者(≥75 岁)则更关注处理问题。相比之下,与患者相比,医生对耐受性和营养与热量的 RI 更高(p=0.002)。总的来说,有更高比例的医生回答说,HEN 特征如易于处理的袋子(85.1%比 64.9%;p=0.001)、容器材料(69.3%比 57.1%;p=0.003)或可重复使用的容器(79.8%比 70.3%;p=0.01)对他们来说是“重要”或“非常重要”。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,尽管患者和医生对不同 HEN 属性的相关性有类似的看法,但他们对每个属性的相对重视程度有所不同。因此,在选择 HEN 产品时,应该考虑到这两个观点,以提高患者的满意度和临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c0/5842881/f4b5f0eed645/41430_2017_23_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c0/5842881/f4b5f0eed645/41430_2017_23_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c0/5842881/f4b5f0eed645/41430_2017_23_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' and professionals' preferences in terms of the attributes of home enteral nutrition products in Spain. A discrete choice experiment.患者和专业人员对西班牙家庭肠内营养产品属性的偏好。一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;72(2):272-280. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0023-8. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
2
[Preferences for the attributes of home enteral nutrition (HEN) in Spain. Do caregivers know their patients' preferences?].[西班牙家庭肠内营养(HEN)属性的偏好。护理人员了解患者的偏好吗?]
Nutr Hosp. 2017 Oct 24;34(5):1013-1023. doi: 10.20960/nh.895.
3
Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma.分析医生观点与患者偏好:多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的直接评估和离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
4
Relative importance of clinical outcomes and safety risks of antiseizure medication monotherapy for patients and physicians: Discrete choice experiment eliciting preferences in real-world study "VOTE".抗癫痫药物单药治疗对患者和医生的临床结局及安全风险的相对重要性:在真实世界研究“VOTE”中进行的离散选择实验以引出偏好
Epilepsia. 2022 Feb;63(2):451-462. doi: 10.1111/epi.17137. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
Patient versus physician preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment.患者与医生对降脂药物治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14043. doi: 10.1111/hex.14043.
6
Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.比较层次分析法和离散选择实验以引出年龄相关性黄斑变性患者对治疗特征的偏好。
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1166-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Evaluation of patient quality of life and satisfaction with home enteral feeding and oral nutrition support services: a cross-sectional study.患者生活质量及对家庭肠内营养和口服营养支持服务满意度的评估:一项横断面研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Jan;40(6):605-612. doi: 10.1071/AH15083.
8
Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.比较离散选择实验和挥重法估计属性相对重要性:肺癌患者偏好的案例研究。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):203-216. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231222421. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
9
Experience of 6 years with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain.西班牙某地区六年家庭肠内营养经验
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;60(4):553-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602354.
10
Preferences for medication attributes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK.英国 2 型糖尿病患者对药物属性的偏好。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Sep;15(9):802-9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12091. Epub 2013 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Physicians' Perception of Oral Nutritional Supplement Acceptance and Tolerability in Malnourished Outpatients: PerceptiONS Study.门诊营养不良患者的口服营养补充接受度和耐受性:医生感知研究(PerceptiONS 研究)。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 28;15(5):1219. doi: 10.3390/nu15051219.
3
Preferences of oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Nutr Hosp. 2016 Nov 29;33(6):1260-1267. doi: 10.20960/nh.769.
2
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
3
Home enteral nutrition in Spain; NADYA registry 2011-2012.西班牙的家庭肠内营养;NADYA注册研究(2011 - 2012年)
胃癌术后患者对口服营养补充治疗的偏好:离散选择实验的属性开发。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275209. eCollection 2022.
4
Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment.胃癌术后患者对口服营养补充治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7447-7456. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07154-8. Epub 2022 May 27.
Nutr Hosp. 2014 Jun 1;29(6):1339-44. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.6.7360.
4
Home enteral nutrition reduces complications, length of stay, and health care costs: results from a multicenter study.家庭肠内营养可降低并发症发生率、缩短住院时间并降低医疗费用:一项多中心研究的结果
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):609-15. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.082842. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
Satisfaction with gastrostomy feeding in caregivers of children with home enteral nutrition; application of the SAGA-8 questionnaire and analysis of involved factors.家庭肠内营养患儿照料者对胃造口喂养的满意度;SAGA - 8问卷的应用及相关因素分析
Nutr Hosp. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1121-8. doi: 10.3305/nh.2013.28.4.6555.
6
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
7
Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.自我们开始倾听患者意见以来,情况有所好转:1982-2007 年联合分析在健康领域的应用趋势。
Patient. 2008 Dec 1;1(4):273-82. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200801040-00009.
8
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.联合分析在健康领域的应用——检查表:ISPOR 联合分析实践良好研究报告任务组报告。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
9
A discrete choice experiment evaluation of patients' preferences for different risk, benefit, and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes management.一项关于糖尿病管理中胰岛素治疗不同风险、益处及给药属性的患者偏好的离散选择实验评估。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Dec 8;4:433-40. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14217.
10
Trends in home enteral nutrition in Spain: analysis of the NADYA registry 1992-2007.西班牙家庭肠内营养的趋势:1992 - 2007年NADYA注册研究分析
Nutr Hosp. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):347-53.