Schulman D S, Remetz M S, Elefteriades J, Frances C K
Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Mar 15;13(4):796-803. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90218-0.
Whether mitral insufficiency is a marker of decreased left ventricular function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for sever aortic stenosis was examined. Hemodynamic measurements in 26 patients with pure aortic stenosis (Group 1), 17 patients with aortic stenosis and grade 1 or 2 mitral insufficiency (Group 2) and 19 control patients were compared. All patients were free of significant coronary artery disease. Ventriculograms were digitized for calculation of ejection fraction, ventricular volumes and wall stress. Despite similar aortic valve areas, Group 2 patients had more advanced symptoms. Cardiac index was comparably decreased in Group 1 (2.6 +/- 0.4 liters/min per m2) and Group 2 (2.7 +/- 0.8 liters/min per m2) compared with the control group (3.8 +/- 0.6 liters/min per m2). Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes were increased only in Group 2 (119 +/- 35 and 73 +/- 36 ml/m2, respectively). Likewise, end-systolic wall stress was increased only in Group 2 (149 +/- 54 kdynes/cm2). Ejection fraction was decreased to a greater extent in Group 2 (42 +/- 17%) than in Group 1 (59 +/- 13%) as compared with values in the control group (68 +/- 5%). Although an inverse relation existed between ejection fraction and end-systolic stress in all groups, the ejection fraction (extrapolated to end-systolic stress = 0) was decreased in Group 2, and the slope of the relation was increased in Groups 1 and 2. The end-systolic stress/end-systolic volume index ratio, an index of ventricular performance, was also decreased to a greater extent in Group 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
研究了二尖瓣关闭不全是否为重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者在接受主动脉瓣置换时左心室功能降低的一个标志。比较了26例单纯主动脉瓣狭窄患者(第1组)、17例主动脉瓣狭窄合并1或2级二尖瓣关闭不全患者(第2组)以及19例对照患者的血流动力学测量结果。所有患者均无明显冠状动脉疾病。心室造影数字化以计算射血分数、心室容积和壁应力。尽管主动脉瓣面积相似,但第2组患者症状更严重。与对照组(3.8±0.6升/分钟每平方米)相比,第1组(2.6±0.4升/分钟每平方米)和第2组(2.7±0.8升/分钟每平方米)的心指数均相应降低。仅第2组的左心室舒张末期和收缩末期容积指数增加(分别为119±35和73±36毫升/平方米)。同样,仅第2组的收缩末期壁应力增加(149±54达因/平方厘米)。与对照组(68±5%)的值相比,第2组(42±17%)的射血分数降低程度大于第1组(59±13%)。尽管所有组的射血分数与收缩末期应力之间均存在负相关,但第2组的射血分数(外推至收缩末期应力=0时)降低,且第1组和第2组该关系的斜率增加。心室功能指标收缩末期应力/收缩末期容积指数比值在第2组也降低得更明显。(摘要截短至250字)