Suppr超能文献

树栖生活限制了蝰蛇的形态进化但不影响其物种多样化。

Arboreality constrains morphological evolution but not species diversification in vipers.

机构信息

Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 20;284(1869). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1775.

Abstract

An increase in ecological opportunities, either through changes in the environment or acquisition of new traits, is frequently associated with an increase in species and morphological diversification. However, it is possible that certain ecological settings might prevent lineages from diversifying. Arboreality evolved multiple times in vipers, making them ideal organisms for exploring how potentially new ecological opportunities affect their morphology and speciation regimes. Arboreal snakes are frequently suggested to have a very specialized morphology, and being too large, too small, too heavy, or having short tails might be challenging for them. Using trait-evolution models, we show that arboreal vipers are evolving towards intermediate body sizes, with longer tails and more slender bodies than terrestrial vipers. Arboreality strongly constrains body size and circumference evolution in vipers, while terrestrial lineages are evolving towards a broader range of morphological variants. Trait-dependent diversification models, however, suggest similar speciation rates between microhabitats. Thus, we show that arboreality might constrain morphological evolution but not necessarily affect the rates at which lineages generate new species.

摘要

生态机会的增加,无论是通过环境变化还是新特征的获得,通常与物种和形态多样化的增加有关。然而,某些生态环境可能会阻止谱系多样化。树栖生活在毒蛇中多次进化,使它们成为探索潜在新生态机会如何影响它们的形态和物种形成机制的理想生物。树栖蛇类通常被认为具有非常特殊的形态,体型过大、过小、过重或尾巴过短可能对它们来说是一个挑战。通过特征进化模型,我们发现树栖毒蛇的体型正在向中间体型进化,尾巴更长,身体更细,与陆生毒蛇相比。树栖生活强烈限制了毒蛇的体型和周长进化,而陆生谱系则朝着更广泛的形态变异进化。然而,基于特征的多样化模型表明,微生境之间的物种形成率相似。因此,我们表明,树栖生活可能会限制形态进化,但不一定会影响谱系产生新物种的速度。

相似文献

2
Life-history adaptations to arboreality in snakes.蛇类对树栖生活的生活史适应性
Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):359-66. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[359:latais]2.0.co;2.
8
Macroevolution of arboreality in salamanders.蝾螈树栖习性的宏观进化
Ecol Evol. 2019 May 26;9(12):7005-7016. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5267. eCollection 2019 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary lability of a key innovation spurs rapid diversification.关键创新的进化易变性推动了快速多样化。
Nature. 2025 Mar;639(8056):962-967. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08612-z. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
7
The patterns and modes of the evolution of disparity in Mesozoic birds.中生代鸟类差异演化的模式与方式。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 10;288(1944):20203105. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3105. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Macroevolution of arboreality in salamanders.蝾螈树栖习性的宏观进化
Ecol Evol. 2019 May 26;9(12):7005-7016. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5267. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION.稳定选择与适应性的比较分析
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1341-1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验