• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:转介、参与率和参与者特征》。

Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.

机构信息

Public Health England, UK.

Diabetes UK, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):513-518. doi: 10.1111/dme.13562. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1111/dme.13562
PMID:29266374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873376/
Abstract

AIMS

To describe early progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme, a behavioural intervention designed to prevent or delay onset of Type 2 diabetes in people in England already identified to be at high risk, to assess numbers of referrals received by Programme providers and the proportion that attended the initial assessment, and to identify the factors associated with attendance rates.

METHODS

These analyses examine the data for referrals received between June 2016 and March 2017.

RESULTS

There were 43 603 referrals received, 16% higher than expected. Of those referred, 49% attended the initial assessment, higher than the 40% modelled uptake. Of those referred, there was no significant difference in uptake by sex (P=0.061); however, attendance per 100 000 population varied significantly by sex, age group, ethnicity and deprivation; it was significantly lower for men (P<0.001), higher as age increased (P<0.001) and higher for individuals from Asian, Afro-Caribbean, mixed and other ethnic groups compared with individuals from white European groups (P<0.001). There was significant interaction between attendance rates by ethnicity and deprivation (P<0.001) such that attendance rates were significantly higher in the most deprived quintile vs the least deprived quintile for Asian, Afro-Caribbean, mixed and other ethnic groups but not significantly different for white European ethnic groups.

CONCLUSION

The analyses show that referral numbers and percentage uptake are in excess of prior modelled values. Characteristics of attendees suggest that the programme is reaching those who are both at greater risk of developing Type 2 diabetes and who typically access healthcare less effectively.

摘要

目的

描述“更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划”的早期进展,该计划是一项行为干预措施,旨在预防或延缓已确定处于高风险的英格兰人 2 型糖尿病的发病,评估计划提供者收到的转介数量以及参加初始评估的比例,并确定与出席率相关的因素。

方法

这些分析检查了 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 3 月期间收到的转介数据。

结果

共收到 43603 份转介,比预期高出 16%。在被转介的人中,有 49%参加了初始评估,高于模拟的参与率 40%。在被转介的人中,性别的参与率没有显著差异(P=0.061);然而,每 10 万人的就诊率因性别、年龄组、族裔和贫困程度而异;男性明显较低(P<0.001),年龄增加时就诊率升高(P<0.001),来自亚洲、非裔加勒比、混合和其他族裔群体的个体就诊率高于来自白种欧洲群体的个体(P<0.001)。族裔和贫困程度的参与率之间存在显著的交互作用(P<0.001),因此,在最贫困的五分位数与最不贫困的五分位数相比,亚洲、非裔加勒比、混合和其他族裔群体的就诊率显著更高,但白种欧洲族裔群体的就诊率没有显著差异。

结论

分析表明,转介数量和参与率超过了之前的模型值。参与者的特征表明,该计划正在接触那些既有更大患 2 型糖尿病风险,又通常无法更有效地获得医疗保健的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c82/5873376/1e181205d0e2/DME-35-513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c82/5873376/1e181205d0e2/DME-35-513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c82/5873376/1e181205d0e2/DME-35-513-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.《更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:转介、参与率和参与者特征》。
Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):513-518. doi: 10.1111/dme.13562. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Who uses NHS Direct? Investigating the impact of ethnicity on the uptake of telephone based healthcare.谁使用国民保健服务指导热线?调查种族对基于电话的医疗保健服务使用情况的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Nov 7;13:99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0099-x.
3
Who uses NHS health checks? Investigating the impact of ethnicity and gender and method of invitation on uptake of NHS health checks.谁会使用国民保健署健康检查?调查种族、性别及邀请方式对国民保健署健康检查接受率的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 20;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0303-2.
4
Social and ethnic group differences in healthcare use by children aged 0-14 years: a population-based cohort study in England from 2007 to 2017.0-14 岁儿童医疗服务利用的社会和种族群体差异:2007 至 2017 年英格兰基于人群的队列研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Jan;107(1):32-39. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321045. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
Early Outcomes From the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的早期成果
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):152-160. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1425. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Evaluation of community provision of a preventive cardiovascular programme - the National Health Service Health Check in reaching the under-served groups by primary care in England: cross sectional observational study.社区提供预防性心血管疾病项目的评估——英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查通过初级保健覆盖服务不足群体:横断面观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2346-5.
7
Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis.转诊至英国国民保健署糖尿病预防计划以及从不伴糖尿病高血糖状态转归为 2 型糖尿病:一项匹配队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(2):e1004177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004177. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
NHS Health Checks for people with mental ill-health 2013-2017: an observational study.2013-2017 年针对精神健康不佳人群的国民保健服务健康检查:一项观察性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Nov 26;29:e188. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001006.
9
The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.强化邀请信对初级医疗中接受国民健康服务健康检查的效果:一项实用的半随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 24;17:35. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0426-y.
10
Referral of patients to diabetes prevention programmes from community campaigns and general practices: mixed-method evaluation using the RE-AIM framework and Normalisation Process Theory.从社区活动和全科医生向糖尿病预防计划转介患者:使用 RE-AIM 框架和常规过程理论的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4139-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.将糖尿病预防项目纳入临床实践和社区环境:系统检索与综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 9;6(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00757-2.
2
Is personality associated with the lived experience of the NHS England low calorie diet programme: A pilot study.个性与英国国家医疗服务体系低热量饮食计划的生活体验有关吗:一项试点研究。
Clin Obes. 2025 Aug;15(4):e70003. doi: 10.1111/cob.70003. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.

本文引用的文献

1
NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: formative evaluation of the programme in early phase implementation.英国国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:该计划早期实施阶段的形成性评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 21;8(2):e019467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019467.
2
A National Effort to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Participant-Level Evaluation of CDC's National Diabetes Prevention Program.全国努力预防 2 型糖尿病:美国疾病控制与预防中心国家糖尿病预防计划的参与者水平评估。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1331-1341. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2099. Epub 2017 May 12.
3
Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care.
使用马尔可夫模型评估英国国民健康服务体系糖尿病预防计划的长期成本效益。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jul;8(4):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
Level of attendance at the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的参与度与 2 型糖尿病进展风险。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jan 12;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01554-7.
5
The effectiveness of digital delivery versus group-based face-to-face delivery of the English National Health Service Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme: a non-inferiority retrospective cohort comparison study.数字传递与基于小组的面对面传递在英国国民健康服务 2 型糖尿病预防计划中的效果比较:一项非劣效性回顾性队列比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10365-2.
6
Multi-omic prediction of incident type 2 diabetes.多组学预测 2 型糖尿病发病风险。
Diabetologia. 2024 Jan;67(1):102-112. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06027-x. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
7
Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England.糖尿病预防计划是否会导致 2 型糖尿病的社会人口学不平等加剧?对英格兰调查和行政数据的比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Sep;77(9):565-570. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219654. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
8
Comparison of weight change between face-to-face and digital delivery of the English National Health service diabetes prevention programme: An exploratory non-inferiority study with imputation of plausible weight outcomes.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划面对面交付与数字交付之间体重变化的比较:一项对似是而非的体重结果进行插补的探索性非劣效性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 20;32:102161. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102161. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study.影响患者参与国家卫生服务数字糖尿病预防计划的因素:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e40961. doi: 10.2196/40961.
10
The Efficacy of Tele-Monitoring in Maintaining Glycated Haemoglobin Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.远程监测对 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的维持效果:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416722.
一项实用试验中体重管理干预措施采用情况的不平等性:一项初级保健中的观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):e258-63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684337. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Scaling up diabetes prevention in Victoria, Australia: policy development, implementation, and evaluation.在澳大利亚维多利亚州扩大糖尿病预防规模:政策制定、实施和评估。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):934-42. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2647. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
5
Participation, socioeconomic status and group or individual counselling intervention in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up study of the FIN-D2D-project.2 型糖尿病高危个体的参与、社会经济地位以及团体或个体咨询干预:FIN-D2D 项目的一年随访研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Dec;6(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
6
Weight loss from three commercial providers of NHS primary care slimming on referral in North Somerset: service evaluation.NHS 初级保健减肥服务推荐给三家商业供应商:北萨默塞特减肥服务评估。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Dec;34(4):555-61. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds034. Epub 2012 May 18.
7
Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.估算英国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的当前和未来成本,包括直接健康成本以及间接的社会和生产力成本。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x.
8
Lifestyle intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary health care: one-year follow-up of the Finnish National Diabetes Prevention Program (FIN-D2D).初级卫生保健中生活方式干预预防 2 型糖尿病:芬兰国家糖尿病预防计划(FIN-D2D)的一年随访结果。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2146-51. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0410. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
9
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.通过生活方式干预或二甲双胍降低2型糖尿病的发病率。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
10
Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.糖耐量受损人群通过生活方式改变预防2型糖尿病
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.