Burns M O, Seligman M E
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;56(3):471-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.471.
Analyzed explanatory style across the life span. 30 Ss whose average age was 72 responded to questions about their current life and provided diaries or letters written in their youth, an average of 52 years earlier. A blind content analysis of explanatory style derived from these 2 sources revealed that explanatory style for negative events was stable throughout adult life (r = .54, p less than .002). In contrast, there appeared to be no stability of explanatory style for positive events between the same 2 time periods. These results suggest that explanatory style for negative events may persist across the life span and may constitute an enduring risk factor for depression, low achievement, and physical illness.
分析了一生的解释风格。30名平均年龄为72岁的受试者回答了关于他们当前生活的问题,并提供了平均52年前年轻时写的日记或信件。对从这两个来源得出的解释风格进行的盲态内容分析表明,负面事件的解释风格在整个成年期都是稳定的(r = 0.54,p小于0.002)。相比之下,在相同的两个时间段之间,积极事件的解释风格似乎没有稳定性。这些结果表明,负面事件的解释风格可能会贯穿一生,并可能构成抑郁、低成就和身体疾病的持久风险因素。