Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center and the Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Leo Beletsky is with the School of Law and the Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA and is also with the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla. Daniel Ciccarone is with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):182-186. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
The accepted wisdom about the US overdose crisis singles out prescribing as the causative vector. Although drug supply is a key factor, we posit that the crisis is fundamentally fueled by economic and social upheaval, its etiology closely linked to the role of opioids as a refuge from physical and psychological trauma, concentrated disadvantage, isolation, and hopelessness. Overreliance on opioid medications is emblematic of a health care system that incentivizes quick, simplistic answers to complex physical and mental health needs. In an analogous way, simplistic measures to cut access to opioids offer illusory solutions to this multidimensional societal challenge. We trace the crisis' trajectory through the intertwined use of opioid analgesics, heroin, and fentanyl analogs, and we urge engaging the structural determinants lens to address this formidable public health emergency. A broad focus on suffering should guide both patient- and community-level interventions.
关于美国药物过量危机,人们普遍认为处方是导致危机的原因。尽管药物供应是一个关键因素,但我们认为,这场危机从根本上说是由经济和社会动荡引起的,其病因与阿片类药物作为身体和心理创伤、集中劣势、孤立和绝望的避难所密切相关。过度依赖阿片类药物是医疗保健系统的一个象征,该系统鼓励对复杂的身心健康需求快速、简单地做出回应。同样,简单地减少阿片类药物的获取途径,对于解决这一多维的社会挑战,只是提供了虚幻的解决方案。我们通过阿片类镇痛药、海洛因和芬太尼类似物的交织使用来追踪这场危机的轨迹,并敦促使用结构决定因素的视角来解决这一严峻的公共卫生紧急情况。广泛关注痛苦应该指导患者和社区层面的干预措施。