• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对青少年的烟草控制政策和项目的成本效益:系统评价。

Cost-effectiveness of tobacco control policies and programmes targeting adolescents: a systematic review.

机构信息

Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx215.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx215
PMID:29267928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5881796/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consistent evidence shows the importance of preventing smoking at young ages, when health behaviours are formed, with long-term consequences on health and survival. Although tobacco control policies and programmes targeting adolescents are widely promoted, the cost-effectiveness of such interventions has not been systematically documented. We performed a systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes preventing tobacco consumption targeting adolescents.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed literature on the (i) cost and effectiveness of (ii) prevention policies targeting (iii) smoking by (iv) adolescents. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, CEA-TUFTS, Health Economic Evaluations, Wiley Online Library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Database, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Google Scholar databases were used, and Google search engine was used for other grey literature review.

RESULTS

We obtained 793 full-text papers and 19 grey literature documents, from which 16 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, only one was published in the last 5 years, and 15 were performed in high-income countries. Eight analyzed the cost-effectiveness of school-based programmes, five focused on media campaigns and three on legal bans. Policies and programmes were found to be cost-effective in all studies, and both effective and cost-saving in about half of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is scarce and relatively obsolete, and rarely focused on the evaluation of legal bans. Moreover, no comparisons have been made between different interventions or across different contexts and implementation levels. However, all studies conclude that smoking prevention policies and programmes amongst adolescents are greatly worth their costs.

摘要

背景

有充分证据表明,在青少年时期养成健康行为时,预防吸烟至关重要,因为这对他们的健康和生存有着长期影响。尽管针对青少年的烟草控制政策和计划得到广泛推广,但这些干预措施的成本效益尚未得到系统记录。我们对预防青少年吸烟的政策和计划的成本效益进行了系统评价。

方法

我们系统地回顾了针对青少年的(i)预防吸烟的(ii)成本和效果(iii)的政策和计划(iv)的文献。使用了 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane、CEA-TUFTS、卫生经济评估、Wiley Online Library、中心审查和传播数据库、国家卫生与保健卓越研究所和 Google 学术数据库,并使用 Google 搜索引擎进行了其他灰色文献综述。

结果

我们共获得了 793 篇全文论文和 19 篇灰色文献,其中有 16 项研究符合纳入标准。其中,只有一项是在过去 5 年内发表的,15 项是在高收入国家进行的。八项研究分析了基于学校的计划的成本效益,五项研究集中在媒体宣传活动上,三项研究侧重于法律禁令。所有研究都发现政策和计划具有成本效益,约有一半的研究具有有效性和成本节约。

结论

证据稀缺且相对陈旧,很少关注法律禁令的评估。此外,不同干预措施或不同背景和实施水平之间的比较也很少进行。然而,所有研究都得出结论,预防青少年吸烟的政策和计划非常值得投入成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fc/5881796/30f597cd0b19/ckx215f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fc/5881796/30f597cd0b19/ckx215f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fc/5881796/30f597cd0b19/ckx215f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of tobacco control policies and programmes targeting adolescents: a systematic review.针对青少年的烟草控制政策和项目的成本效益:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):39-43. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx215.
2
Economic Evaluation of Five Tobacco Control Policies Across Seven European Countries.经济评估五种烟草控制政策在七个欧洲国家。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(7):1202-1209. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz124.
3
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.吸烟及降低吸烟率的经济影响:证据综述
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.基于家庭的、由护士主导的老年人健康促进的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200.
5
Cost-effectiveness evidence of mental health prevention and promotion interventions: A systematic review of economic evaluations.心理健康预防和促进干预措施的成本效益证据:经济评估的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2021 May 11;18(5):e1003606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003606. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults.针对成年人戒烟的大众媒体干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD004704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004704.pub4.
9
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a smokeless tobacco control mass media campaign in India.印度无烟烟草控制大众媒体运动的成本效益分析。
Tob Control. 2018 Sep;27(5):547-551. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053564. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The PHEM-B toolbox of methods for incorporating the influences on Behaviour into Public Health Economic Models.PHEM-B 工具包方法,用于将行为影响纳入公共卫生经济模型。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):2794. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20225-1.
2
The long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health interventions; how can we model behavior? A review.公共卫生干预措施的长期效果和成本效益;我们如何模拟行为?综述。
Health Econ. 2023 Dec;32(12):2836-2854. doi: 10.1002/hec.4754. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Gender differences in the price elasticity of demand for waterpipe and cigarette smoking in Lebanon, Jordan and Palestine: a volumetric choice experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Modifiable causes of premature death in middle-age in Western Europe: results from the EPIC cohort study.西欧中年人群过早死亡的可改变因素:欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)队列研究结果
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 14;14:87. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0630-6.
2
An evaluation of health impact assessments in the United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国健康影响评估情况评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Feb 19;12:E23. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140376.
3
The cost-effectiveness of a school-based smoking prevention program in India.印度一项基于学校的预防吸烟项目的成本效益分析。
黎巴嫩、约旦和巴勒斯坦的水烟和香烟需求价格弹性的性别差异:体积选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e058495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058495.
4
Tobacco and nicotine use.烟草和尼古丁使用。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00346-w.
5
Protocol for the evaluation of cost-effectiveness and health equity impact of a school-based tobacco prevention programme in a cluster randomised controlled trial (the TOPAS study).基于群组随机对照试验(TOPAS 研究)评估基于学校的烟草预防计划的成本效益和健康公平影响的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e045476. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045476.
6
Smoking in Teenagers from the Social Protection System-What Do We Know about It?《社会保护体系中的青少年吸烟问题——我们对此了解多少?》
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 12;57(5):484. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050484.
7
Comprehensive approach to HIV/AIDS testing and linkage to treatment among men who have sex with men in Curitiba, Brazil.巴西库里提巴男男性行为者中艾滋病毒/艾滋病检测和治疗衔接的综合方法。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0249877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249877. eCollection 2021.
8
From Neglect to Equity vis-a-vis Noncommunicable Diseases and Neglected Tropical Diseases.从忽视到非传染性疾病和被忽视热带病方面的公平
Indian J Community Med. 2019 Oct;44(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_304_19.
9
Cost of youth tobacco-control policies in seven European countries.七个欧洲国家青少年控烟政策成本。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;30(2):374-379. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz150.
10
Economic Evaluation of Five Tobacco Control Policies Across Seven European Countries.经济评估五种烟草控制政策在七个欧洲国家。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(7):1202-1209. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz124.
Health Promot Int. 2013 Jun;28(2):178-86. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar095. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
4
Reducing smoking in adolescents: cost-effectiveness results from the cluster randomized ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial).减少青少年吸烟:来自集群随机对照 ASSIST(学校戒烟试验)的成本效益结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Feb;14(2):161-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr155. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
5
Tobacco habit: historical, cultural, neurobiological, and genetic features of people's relationship with an addictive drug.烟草习惯:人们与一种成瘾性药物关系的历史、文化、神经生物学及遗传学特征。
Perspect Biol Med. 2011 Autumn;54(4):557-77. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2011.0047.
6
What factors influence smoking prevalence and smoke free policy enactment across the European Union Member States.哪些因素影响欧盟成员国的吸烟流行率和无烟政策的制定。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023889. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Cost-utility analysis of the National truth campaign to prevent youth smoking.全国预防青少年吸烟真相运动的成本效用分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.020. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign.澳大利亚全国烟草运动的成本效益
Tob Control. 2008 Dec;17(6):379-84. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025213. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
9
Cost-effectiveness analyses of health promotion programs: a case study of smoking prevention and cessation among Dutch students.健康促进项目的成本效益分析:以荷兰学生预防和戒烟为例的研究
Health Educ Res. 2008 Apr;23(2):310-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cym024. Epub 2007 Aug 4.
10
Do school-based tobacco prevention programmes pay off? The cost-effectiveness of the 'Smoke-free Class Competition'.以学校为基础的烟草预防项目有成效吗?“无烟班级竞赛”的成本效益分析。
Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jul 26.