UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023889. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Smoking prevention should be a primary public health priority for all governments, and effective preventive policies have been identified for decades. The heterogeneity of smoking prevalence between European Union (EU) Member States therefore reflects, at least in part, a failure by governments to prioritise public health over tobacco industry or possibly other financial interests, and hence potentially government corruption. The aims of this study were to test the hypothesis that smoking prevalence is higher in countries with high levels of public sector corruption, and explore the ecological association between smoking prevalence and a range of other national characteristics in current EU Member States.
Ecological data from 27 EU Member States were used to estimate univariate and multivariate correlations between smoking prevalence and the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, and a range of other national characteristics including economic development, social inclusion, quality of life and importance of religion. We also explored the association between the Corruption Perceptions Index and measures of the extent to which smoke-free policies have been enacted and are enforced.
In univariate analysis, smoking prevalence was significantly higher in countries with higher scores for corruption, material deprivation, and gender inequality; and lower in countries with higher per capita Gross Domestic Product, social spending, life satisfaction and human development scores. In multivariate analysis, only the corruption perception index was independently related to smoking prevalence. Exposure to tobacco smoke in the workplace was also correlated with corruption, independently from smoking prevalence, but not with the measures of national smoke-free policy implementation.
Corruption appears to be an important risk factor for failure of national tobacco control activity in EU countries, and the extent to which key tobacco control policies have been implemented. Further research is needed to assess the causal relationships involved.
预防吸烟应成为所有政府的首要公共卫生重点,几十年来已经确定了有效的预防政策。因此,欧盟成员国之间吸烟率的异质性至少部分反映了政府未能将公共卫生置于烟草业或可能的其他财政利益之上,因此可能存在政府腐败。本研究的目的是检验以下假设,即在公共部门腐败程度较高的国家,吸烟率较高,并探讨当前欧盟成员国吸烟率与一系列其他国家特征之间的生态关联。
使用来自 27 个欧盟成员国的生态数据,估计吸烟率与透明国际腐败感知指数以及其他一系列国家特征(包括经济发展、社会包容、生活质量和宗教重要性)之间的单变量和多变量相关性。我们还探讨了腐败感知指数与无烟政策实施和执行程度的衡量标准之间的关联。
在单变量分析中,腐败程度、物质匮乏和性别不平等程度较高的国家的吸烟率明显较高;而人均国内生产总值、社会支出、生活满意度和人类发展得分较高的国家的吸烟率较低。在多变量分析中,只有腐败感知指数与吸烟率独立相关。工作场所暴露于烟草烟雾也与腐败有关,与吸烟率独立相关,但与国家无烟政策实施的衡量标准无关。
腐败似乎是欧盟国家国家烟草控制活动失败和关键烟草控制政策实施程度的一个重要风险因素。需要进一步研究来评估所涉及的因果关系。