• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Early identification of patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome among severe pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.重症肺炎患者中急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者的早期识别:一项回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):3979-3995. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.20.
2
[Analysis of characteristics and related risk factors of prognosis in elderly and young adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].[老年与青年急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后特征及相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Nov;26(11):794-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.11.006.
3
[Dynamic measurement of volume of atelectasis area in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome].[动态测量肺不张面积在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后评估中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191219-00056.
4
[Evaluation value of sequential organ failure assessment score for predicting the prognosis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to severe pneumonia].序贯器官衰竭评估评分对预测重症肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的评估价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Sep;33(9):1057-1062. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210115-00076.
5
[The levels of angiopoietin-2 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and its value on prognosis].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血管生成素-2水平及其对预后的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Nov;26(11):804-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.11.008.
6
[Risk factors analysis of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care unit traumatic patients].[重症监护病房创伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Oct;30(10):978-982. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.010.015.
7
P/FP ratio: incorporation of PEEP into the PaO/FiO ratio for prognostication and classification of acute respiratory distress syndrome.P/FP比值:将呼气末正压(PEEP)纳入动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO/FiO)比值用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后评估和分类
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00908-3.
8
The impacts of baseline ventilator parameters on hospital mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study.基线呼吸机参数对接受静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合治疗的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者住院死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0520-5.
9
[Analysis of risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to severe multiple trauma].[严重多发伤继发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):299-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201023-00685.
10
Risk stratification of acute respiratory distress syndrome using a PaO2: Fio2 threshold of 150 mmHg: A retrospective analysis from an Indian intensive care unit.使用动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度比值150 mmHg阈值对急性呼吸窘迫综合征进行风险分层:来自印度重症监护病房的回顾性分析
Lung India. 2020 Nov-Dec;37(6):473-478. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_146_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of individualized nursing interventions on ventilator weaning and respiratory outcomes in ICU patients with severe pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.个体化护理干预对重症肺炎ICU患者撤机及呼吸结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e43355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043355.
2
Evaluating the Use of Inhaled Budesonide and Ipratropium Bromide Combination in Patients at High Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Development: A Randomized Controlled Trial.评估吸入布地奈德与异丙托溴铵联合用药在急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(3):412. doi: 10.3390/ph18030412.
3
Machine learning-based model for predicting the occurrence and mortality of nonpulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS.基于机器学习的模型预测非肺部脓毒症相关性 ARDS 的发生和死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79899-7.
4
Clinical characteristics and predictors of burn complicated with smoke inhalation injury: A retrospective analysis.烧伤合并吸入性损伤的临床特征及预测因素:一项回顾性分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Nov 9;24(6):758. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11694. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Profound Effect of Pulmonary Surfactant on the Treatment of Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.肺表面活性剂对治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的深远影响。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Oct 3;2022:4166994. doi: 10.1155/2022/4166994. eCollection 2022.
6
Early detection of gram-negative bacteria using metagenomic next-generation sequencing in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A case report.利用宏基因组下一代测序技术在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中早期检测革兰氏阴性菌:一例报告
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jul 15;24(3):573. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11510. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Early prediction of moderate-to-severe condition of inhalation-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome via interpretable machine learning.通过可解释的机器学习对吸入性急性呼吸窘迫综合征的中重度病情进行早期预测。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 May 12;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01963-7.
8
Can Serum Fibrinogen Predict ARDS?血清纤维蛋白原能否预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征?
Infect Dis (Auckl). 2020 Jul 20;13:1178633720943505. doi: 10.1177/1178633720943505. eCollection 2020.
9
A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality.生物标志物与急性呼吸窘迫综合征发展和死亡率的多变量相关性的系统评价。
Crit Care. 2020 May 24;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02913-7.
10
Epidemiological and Clinical Profiles of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Admitted to Medical Intensive Care in Qatar: A Retrospective Analysis of the Data Registry for the Year 2015.卡塔尔医学重症监护病房收治的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学和临床特征:2015年数据登记回顾性分析
Qatar Med J. 2019 Jul 30;2019(1):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.3. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Age, PaO2/FIO2, and Plateau Pressure Score: A Proposal for a Simple Outcome Score in Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.年龄、动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值及平台压评分:急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者简单预后评分方案
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1361-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001653.
2
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
3
Initial synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus assist/control ventilation in treatment of moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial.初始同步间歇强制通气与辅助/控制通气治疗中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2262-73. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.63.
4
Risk factor analysis of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in valvular heart surgery.心脏瓣膜手术术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact.急性呼吸窘迫综合征保护性通气期间发生急性肺心病:患病率、预测因素和临床影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4141-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
Acute respiratory distress syndrome mimickers lacking common risk factors of the Berlin definition.缺乏柏林定义常见危险因素的急性呼吸窘迫综合征类似物。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Feb;42(2):164-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4064-y. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
Prognostic factors in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后因素。
Clin Transl Med. 2015 Dec;4(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40169-015-0065-2. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Prehospital aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.院前使用阿司匹林与危重症患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险降低相关:一项倾向调整分析。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):801-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000789.
9
Prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预防
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Feb;21(1):82-90. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000174.
10
Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence as a risk factor for poor outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome*.巨细胞病毒血清阳性率作为急性呼吸窘迫综合征不良结局的危险因素*。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):394-400. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000712.

重症肺炎患者中急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者的早期识别:一项回顾性队列研究

Early identification of patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome among severe pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Luo Jian, Yu He, Hu Yue-Hong, Liu Dan, Wang Yi-Wei, Wang Mao-Yun, Liang Bin-Miao, Liang Zong-An

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, West China School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):3979-3995. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.20.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.09.20
PMID:29268409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5723858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe pneumonia is the predominant cause for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Identification of ARDS from patients with severe pneumonia remains a significant clinical problem due to the overlap of clinical presentations and symptoms. Early recognition of risks for ARDS from severe pneumonia is of great clinical value.

METHODS

From April 2014 to December 2015, patients with severe pneumonia at admission were retrieved from the hospital database, of which ARDS developed within 7 days were further identified. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics at admission between severe pneumonia patients with and without ARDS development, followed by analysis of potential predictors for ARDS development and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to screen independent risk factors and identify their sensitivity in predicting ARDS development and prognosis.

RESULTS

Compared with severe pneumonia without ARDS development, patients with ARDS development had shorter disease duration before admission, higher lung injury score (LIS), serum fibrinogen (FiB), and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), lower Marshall score, sequential organ failure assessment score and proportion of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases, but similar mortality. Serum FiB >5.15 g/L [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.893, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.141-3.142, P=0.014] and PEEP >6.5 cmHO (adjusted OR 1.651, 95% CI: 1.218-2.237, P=0.001) were independent predictors for ARDS development with a sensitivity of 58.3% and 87.5%, respectively, and pH <7.35 (adjusted OR 0.832, 95% CI: 0.702-0.985, P=0.033) was an independent risk factor for ARDS mortality with a sensitivity of 95.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

ARDS development risk could be early recognized by PEEP >6.5 cmHO and serum FiB >5.15 g/L in severe pneumonia patients, and pH <7.35 is a reliable prognostic factor in predicting ARDS mortality risk.

摘要

背景

重症肺炎是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的主要病因。由于临床表现和症状重叠,从重症肺炎患者中识别ARDS仍然是一个重大的临床问题。早期识别重症肺炎患者发生ARDS的风险具有重要的临床价值。

方法

2014年4月至2015年12月,从医院数据库中检索入院时患有重症肺炎的患者,进一步确定其中在7天内发生ARDS的患者。我们比较了发生ARDS和未发生ARDS的重症肺炎患者入院时的人口统计学和临床特征,随后分析了ARDS发生和死亡的潜在预测因素。进行多因素逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以筛选独立危险因素,并确定它们在预测ARDS发生和预后方面的敏感性。

结果

与未发生ARDS的重症肺炎患者相比,发生ARDS的患者入院前病程较短,肺损伤评分(LIS)、血清纤维蛋白原(FiB)和呼气末正压(PEEP)较高,马歇尔评分、序贯器官衰竭评估评分以及心血管和胃肠道疾病的比例较低,但死亡率相似。血清FiB>5.15 g/L[调整后的优势比(OR)1.893,95%置信区间(CI):1.141-3.142,P=0.014]和PEEP>6.5 cmH₂O(调整后的OR 1.651,95%CI:1.218-2.237,P=0.001)是ARDS发生的独立预测因素,敏感性分别为58.3%和87.5%,pH<7.35(调整后的OR 0.832,95%CI:0.702-0.985,P=0.033)是ARDS死亡的独立危险因素,敏感性为95.2%。

结论

重症肺炎患者中,PEEP>6.5 cmH₂O和血清FiB>5.15 g/L可早期识别ARDS发生风险,pH<7.35是预测ARDS死亡风险的可靠预后因素。