Suppr超能文献

临床能力委员会使用急诊医学里程碑进行直线评分

Straight Line Scoring by Clinical Competency Committees Using Emergency Medicine Milestones.

作者信息

Beeson Michael S, Hamstra Stanley J, Barton Melissa A, Yamazaki Kenji, Counselman Francis L, Shayne Philip H, Holmboe Eric S, Muelleman Robert L, Reisdorff Earl J

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):716-720. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00304.1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2013, milestone ratings became a reporting requirement for emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. Programs rate each resident in the fall and spring on 23 milestone subcompetencies.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the incidence of straight line scoring (SLS) for EM Milestone ratings, defined as a resident being assessed the same score across the milestone subcompetencies.

METHODS

This descriptive analysis measured the frequencies of SLS for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited EM programs during the 2015-2016 academic year. Outcomes were the frequency of SLS in the fall and spring milestone assessments, changes in the number of SLS reports, and reporting trends. Chi-square analysis compared nominal variables.

RESULTS

There were 6257 residents in the fall and 6588 in the spring. Milestone scores were reported for 6173 EM residents in the fall (99% of 6257) and spring (94% of 6588). In the fall, 93% (5753 residents) did not receive SLS ratings and 420 (7%) did, with no significant difference compared with the spring (5776 [94%] versus 397 [6%]). Subgroup analysis showed higher SLS results for residents' first ratings (183 of 2136 versus 237 of 4220, < .0001) and for their final ratings (200 of 2019 versus 197 of 4354, < .0001). Twenty percent of programs submitted 10% or more SLS ratings, and a small percentage submitted more than 50% of ratings as SLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Most programs did not submit SLS ratings. Because of the statistical improbability of SLS, any SLS ratings reduce the validity assertions of the milestone assessments.

摘要

背景

2013年起,里程碑式评分成为急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训项目的一项报告要求。各项目在秋季和春季对每位住院医师的23项里程碑子能力进行评分。

目的

本研究调查了急诊医学里程碑式评分中直线评分(SLS)的发生率,直线评分定义为住院医师在各项里程碑子能力上被评定为相同分数。

方法

本描述性分析测量了2015 - 2016学年所有经研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证的急诊医学项目的直线评分频率。结果包括秋季和春季里程碑评估中的直线评分频率、直线评分报告数量的变化以及报告趋势。卡方分析用于比较名义变量。

结果

秋季有6257名住院医师,春季有6588名。秋季有6173名急诊医学住院医师(占6257的99%)和春季有6173名(占6588的94%)报告了里程碑评分。秋季,93%(5753名住院医师)未获得直线评分,420名(7%)获得了直线评分,与春季相比无显著差异(分别为5776名[94%]和397名[6%])。亚组分析显示,住院医师首次评分(2136名中的183名对4220名中的237名,P <.0001)和最终评分(2019名中的200名对4354名中的197名,P <.0001)的直线评分结果更高。20%的项目提交了10%或更多的直线评分,一小部分项目提交的评分中有超过50%为直线评分。

结论

大多数项目未提交直线评分。由于直线评分在统计学上不太可能出现,任何直线评分都会降低里程碑评估的有效性断言。

相似文献

2
Simulation for Assessment of Milestones in Emergency Medicine Residents.急诊住院医师评估里程碑的模拟。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):205-220. doi: 10.1111/acem.13296. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Initial Validity Analysis of the Emergency Medicine Milestones.急诊医学里程碑的初始效度分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):838-44. doi: 10.1111/acem.12697. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验