Suppr超能文献

研究生培训第一年使用美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)统一里程碑时学员表现的差异

Variability in Learner Performance Using the ACGME Harmonized Milestones During the First Year of Postgraduate Training.

作者信息

Santen Sally A, Ryan Michael S, Fancher Tonya L, Carcamo Tyler, Hogan Sean O, Turner Laurah, Cheung Jeffrey J H, Berg Katherine, Feldman Moshe, Holmboe Eric S, Park Yoon Soo

出版信息

Acad Med. 2025 Jul 1;100(7):852-859. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006053. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Postgraduate medical training in the United States requires formative assessments of learners using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones system. With Milestones 2.0, Harmonized Milestones (HMs) for 4 competency domains (professionalism, communication and interpersonal skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement) across specialties were developed. Performance of postgraduate trainees across specialties and at the transition to residency can be explored with the HMs. This study examined the factors that contribute to the variability in the assessments of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) learners as measured using Milestones 2.0.

METHOD

This retrospective study assessed national ACGME HM data from PGY-1 residents at U.S. medical schools in July 2021 and 2022 from the 6 largest specialties: emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, psychiatry, and pediatrics. Variance component analyses were conducted using cross-classified random-effects models, accounting for clustering; estimated variance components were used to generate inference on contribution of learner variability due to residency program, medical school, and specialty and make inferences on HM rating practices, including straight-lining.

RESULTS

The sample included 57,132 PGY-1 residents (2,430 programs). Specialty accounted for the largest variance (22%) across HM competency domains. Within specialty, variance components for trainees, residency programs, and medical schools accounted for 22%, 35%, and 2% of total variance, respectively. Straight-lining was found at 6 months for 6,827 of 56,804 PGY-1 residents (12%), with the greatest amount in surgery (2,105 of 5,559 [38%]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found variability in HM performance across 6 specialties due to medical schools, specialty, residency programs, and trainees with limited variability attributed to medical school and learner. Substantial differences across specialties call for the need for clinical educators, researchers, and accreditors to create a shared mental model to bolster the evaluative strength of milestones and prepare residents for the needs of health care.

摘要

目的

美国的研究生医学培训要求使用毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的里程碑系统对学习者进行形成性评估。随着里程碑2.0的推出,针对各专业4个能力领域(职业素养、沟通与人际技能、基于系统的实践以及基于实践的学习与改进)制定了统一里程碑(HM)。通过这些统一里程碑,可以探究各专业研究生学员在整个研究生阶段以及向住院医师阶段过渡时的表现。本研究调查了使用里程碑2.0评估时,导致一年级研究生(PGY - 1)学员评估结果存在差异的因素。

方法

这项回顾性研究评估了2021年7月和2022年美国医学院校PGY - 1住院医师的全国ACGME统一里程碑数据,这些住院医师来自6个最大的专业:急诊医学、家庭医学、内科、普通外科、精神病学和儿科学。使用交叉分类随机效应模型进行方差成分分析,并考虑聚类因素;估计的方差成分用于推断住院医师培训项目、医学院校和专业对学员差异的贡献,并对包括直线评分在内的统一里程碑评分实践进行推断。

结果

样本包括57,132名PGY - 1住院医师(2,430个培训项目)。在统一里程碑能力领域中,专业占最大方差(22%)。在各专业内部,学员、住院医师培训项目和医学院校的方差成分分别占总方差的22%、35%和2%。在56,804名PGY - 1住院医师中,有6,827名(12%)在6个月时出现直线评分,其中外科最多(5,559名中有2,105名[38%])。

结论

本研究发现,由于医学院校、专业、住院医师培训项目和学员的原因,6个专业在统一里程碑表现上存在差异,而医学院校和学员造成的差异有限。各专业之间的显著差异要求临床教育工作者、研究人员和认证机构建立一个共享的思维模式,以增强里程碑的评估力度,并使住院医师为医疗保健需求做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9165/12237136/a21c5a84c6e7/acadmed-100-852-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验