Wang Rui-Ping, Jiang Yong-Gen, Zhao Gen-Ming, Guo Xiao-Qin, Michael Engelgau
School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Songjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 201620, China.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017 Dec;37(6):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
The China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS) was successfully implemented and became operational nationwide in 2008. The CIDARS plays an important role in and has been integrated into the routine outbreak monitoring efforts of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) at all levels in China. In the CIDARS, thresholds are determined using the "Mean+2SD‟ in the early stage which have limitations. This study compared the performance of optimized thresholds defined using the "Mean +2SD‟ method to the performance of 5 novel algorithms to select optimal "Outbreak Gold Standard (OGS)‟ and corresponding thresholds for outbreak detection. Data for infectious disease were organized by calendar week and year. The "Mean+2SD‟, C1, C2, moving average (MA), seasonal model (SM), and cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithms were applied. Outbreak signals for the predicted value (Px) were calculated using a percentile-based moving window. When the outbreak signals generated by an algorithm were in line with a Px generated outbreak signal for each week, this Px was then defined as the optimized threshold for that algorithm. In this study, six infectious diseases were selected and classified into TYPE A (chickenpox and mumps), TYPE B (influenza and rubella) and TYPE C [hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and scarlet fever]. Optimized thresholds for chickenpox (P), mumps (P), influenza (P, P, and P), rubella (P and P), HFMD (P and P), and scarlet fever (P and P) were identified. The C1, C2, CUSUM, SM, and MA algorithms were appropriate for TYPE A. All 6 algorithms were appropriate for TYPE B. C1 and CUSUM algorithms were appropriate for TYPE C. It is critical to incorporate more flexible algorithms as OGS into the CIDRAS and to identify the proper OGS and corresponding recommended optimized threshold by different infectious disease types.
中国传染病自动预警与响应系统(CIDARS)于2008年成功实施并在全国范围内投入运行。CIDARS在中国各级疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的常规疫情监测工作中发挥着重要作用,并已融入其中。在CIDARS中,早期使用“均值+2标准差”来确定阈值,存在一定局限性。本研究将使用“均值+2标准差”方法定义的优化阈值的性能与5种新算法的性能进行比较,以选择最佳的“疫情金标准(OGS)”及相应的疫情检测阈值。传染病数据按日历周和年份进行整理。应用了“均值+2标准差”、C1、C2、移动平均(MA)、季节模型(SM)和累积和(CUSUM)算法。使用基于百分位数的移动窗口计算预测值(Px)的疫情信号。当一种算法生成的疫情信号与每周的Px生成的疫情信号一致时,该Px随后被定义为该算法的优化阈值。在本研究中,选择了6种传染病,并分为A类(水痘和腮腺炎)、B类(流感和风疹)和C类[手足口病(HFMD)和猩红热]。确定了水痘(P)、腮腺炎(P)、流感(P、P和P)、风疹(P和P)、手足口病(P和P)和猩红热(P和P)的优化阈值。C1、C2、CUSUM、SM和MA算法适用于A类。所有6种算法都适用于B类。C1和CUSUM算法适用于C类。将更灵活的算法作为OGS纳入CIDRAS,并根据不同传染病类型确定合适的OGS和相应的推荐优化阈值至关重要。