Chansakul Thanissara, Young Geoffrey S
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Semin Neurol. 2017 Dec;37(6):712-723. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608939. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Choosing the most appropriate diagnostic neuroimaging study for a pregnant woman involves assessing the pretest likelihood of serious treatable neurologic disease, the diagnostic utility of various available computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) modalities, and the risks of each. Of these three elements-pretest differential diagnosis, utility of MRI and CT, and risks of MR and CT-the risk component is perhaps the least well understood by most physicians. We provide a basic review of the intrinsic risks of MRI and CT, particularly radiation biology and radiation safety, as well as the risks pertaining to the use of contrast agents, to reduce provider confusion and anxiety and improve quality, safety, and efficiency of neuroimaging diagnosis in pregnant patients. We believe that a better understanding of the associated very low risks with mother and fetus will reassure the reader that CT remains the most appropriate tool for initial rapid diagnosis of acute neurological conditions in pregnancy and that in urgent situations CT should not be withheld or delayed due to exaggerated concern about radiation. Noncontrast MRI, while not without risk, is generally considered safe in pregnancy, as no evidence of fetal adverse effects has been demonstrated to date. Iodinated CT contrast agents are likely safer than gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents because of gadolinium accumulation in the amniotic fluid and fetal tissue, although no harmful effects of tissue gadolinium accumulation are known. In most but not all pregnant patients presenting with a new or worsening neurological abnormality, the risks intrinsic to the disease will outweigh the risks of imaging. In an individual patient, the pretest probability of serious treatable disease and acuity of presentation will usually suggest an optimal imaging strategy and choice of test. This optimal strategy will also depend on the immediate availability and level of sophistication of the scanners, software, technologists, and radiologists. As such, the standard of care for imaging in pregnancy requires direct consultation between the referring clinician and radiologist to determine the most appropriate strategy and brief documentation of the resulting consensus risk-benefit assessment.
为孕妇选择最合适的诊断性神经影像学检查,需要评估严重可治疗性神经系统疾病的检查前可能性、各种可用的计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MR)检查方式的诊断效用以及每种检查的风险。在这三个要素中——检查前鉴别诊断、MRI和CT的效用以及MR和CT的风险——风险部分可能是大多数医生了解最少的。我们对MRI和CT的内在风险进行了基本综述,特别是放射生物学和辐射安全,以及与使用造影剂相关的风险,以减少医疗人员的困惑和焦虑,并提高对孕妇神经影像学诊断的质量、安全性和效率。我们相信,更好地了解与母亲和胎儿相关的极低风险,将使读者放心,CT仍然是孕期急性神经系统疾病初始快速诊断的最合适工具,在紧急情况下,不应因对辐射的过度担忧而不进行或延迟CT检查。非增强MRI虽然并非没有风险,但由于迄今为止尚无胎儿不良影响的证据,一般认为在孕期是安全的。碘化CT造影剂可能比钆基MRI造影剂更安全,因为钆会在羊水和胎儿组织中蓄积,尽管目前尚不清楚组织中钆蓄积的有害影响。在大多数(但不是所有)出现新的或恶化的神经异常的孕妇中,疾病本身的风险将超过影像学检查的风险。对于个体患者,严重可治疗疾病的检查前概率和症状的严重程度通常会提示最佳的影像学策略和检查选择。这种最佳策略还将取决于扫描仪、软件、技术人员和放射科医生的即时可用性和先进程度。因此,孕期影像学检查的护理标准要求转诊临床医生和放射科医生直接协商,以确定最合适的策略,并简要记录由此达成的风险效益评估共识。