Keenan Heather T, Campbell Kristine A, Page Kent, Cook Lawrence J, Bardsley Tyler, Olson Lenora M
Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, P.O. Box 581289, Salt Lake City, UT, 84158, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, P.O. Box 581289, Salt Lake City, UT, 84158, USA.
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Dec 22;17(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0969-7.
The medical literature reports differential decision-making for children with suspected physical abuse based on race and socioeconomic status. Differential evaluation may be related to differences of risk indicators in these populations or differences in physicians' perceptions of abuse risk. Our objective was to understand the contribution of the child's social ecology to child abuse pediatricians' perception of abuse risk and to test whether risk perception influences diagnostic decision-making.
Thirty-two child abuse pediatrician participants prospectively contributed 746 consultations from for children referred for physical abuse evaluation (2009-2013). Participants entered consultations to a web-based interface. Participants noted their perception of child race, family SES, abuse diagnosis. Participants rated their perception of social risk for abuse and diagnostic certainty on a 1-100 scale. Consultations (n = 730) meeting inclusion criteria were qualitatively analyzed for social risk indicators, social and non-social cues. Using a linear mixed-effects model, we examined the associations of social risk indicators with participant social risk perception. We reversed social risk indicators in 102 cases whilst leaving all injury mechanism and medical information unchanged. Participants reviewed these reversed cases and recorded their social risk perception, diagnosis and diagnostic certainty.
After adjustment for physician characteristics and social risk indicators, social risk perception was highest in the poorest non-minority families (24.9 points, 95%CI: 19.2, 30.6) and minority families (17.9 points, 95%CI, 12.8, 23.0). Diagnostic certainty and perceived social risk were associated: certainty increased as social risk perception increased (Spearman correlation 0.21, p < 0.001) in probable abuse cases; certainty decreased as risk perception increased (Spearman correlation (-)0.19, p = 0.003) in probable not abuse cases. Diagnostic decisions changed in 40% of cases when social risk indicators were reversed.
CAP risk perception that poverty is associated with higher abuse risk may explain documented race and class disparities in the medical evaluation and diagnosis of suspected child physical abuse. Social risk perception may act by influencing CAP certainty in their diagnosis.
医学文献报道,对于疑似身体虐待的儿童,会基于种族和社会经济地位做出不同的决策。差异评估可能与这些人群中风险指标的差异或医生对虐待风险的认知差异有关。我们的目标是了解儿童的社会生态对虐待儿童儿科医生对虐待风险认知的影响,并测试风险认知是否会影响诊断决策。
32名虐待儿童儿科医生参与者前瞻性地提供了746例因身体虐待评估而转诊儿童的会诊记录(2009 - 2013年)。参与者将会诊记录录入基于网络的界面。参与者记录他们对儿童种族、家庭社会经济地位、虐待诊断的认知。参与者在1 - 100的量表上对他们对虐待的社会风险认知和诊断确定性进行评分。对符合纳入标准的730例会诊记录进行定性分析,以确定社会风险指标、社会和非社会线索。使用线性混合效应模型,我们研究了社会风险指标与参与者社会风险认知之间的关联。我们在102个案例中颠倒了社会风险指标,同时保持所有损伤机制和医疗信息不变。参与者重新查看这些颠倒后的案例,并记录他们的社会风险认知、诊断和诊断确定性。
在调整医生特征和社会风险指标后,最贫困的非少数族裔家庭(24.9分,95%置信区间:19.2,30.6)和少数族裔家庭(17.9分,95%置信区间,12.8,23.0)的社会风险认知最高。诊断确定性与感知到的社会风险相关:在可能存在虐待的案例中,随着社会风险认知的增加,确定性增加(斯皮尔曼相关性0.21,p < 0.001);在可能不存在虐待的案例中,随着风险认知的增加,确定性降低(斯皮尔曼相关性(-)0.19,p = 0.003)。当社会风险指标颠倒时,40%的案例诊断决策发生了变化。
儿童虐待儿科医生认为贫困与更高的虐待风险相关的这种风险认知,可能解释了在疑似儿童身体虐待的医学评估和诊断中记录在案的种族和阶层差异。社会风险认知可能通过影响儿童虐待儿科医生诊断的确定性来发挥作用。