Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318276466c.
To assess how U.S. academic health centers (AHCs) define the term underrepresented minority (URM) and apply it to their diversity programs, following the 2003 revision of the Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC's) definition of URM.
In 2010, the authors developed and deployed a cross-sectional survey of diversity leaders at 106 AHCs. The survey included questions about the diversity leader and institution's diversity program; institution's URM definition; application of that definition; and the diversity leader's perceptions of the representation and institutional contribution of various ethnic/racial groups. The authors used descriptive statistics to analyze the results.
Of the 106 diversity leaders invited, 89 (84.0%) responded and 78 (73.6%) provided a working definition of URM. Most programs (40/78; 51%) used the 2003 AAMC definition of URM, which includes racial/ethnic groups that are underrepresented in medicine relative to local and national demographics. Only 14.1% (11/78) used the pre-2003 AAMC definition, which included only African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, and mainland Puerto Ricans. Approximately one-third (23/78; 29.5%) also considered other diversity factors, such as socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and disability, in defining URM. Fifty-eight respondents (74.4%) confirmed that their diversity programs targeted specific groups.
The definition of URM used by diversity programs at U.S. AHCs varied widely. Although some classified URMs by racial/ethnic categories, the majority defined URM more broadly to encompass other demographic and personal characteristics. This shift should prepare academic medicine to eliminate health disparities and meet the health needs of an increasingly diverse population.
评估美国学术健康中心(AHC)如何定义代表性不足少数族裔(URM)一词,并根据美国医学协会(AAMC)2003 年对 URM 的定义修订版,将其应用于多样性计划。
2010 年,作者对 106 个 AHC 的多样性领导者进行了横断面调查。调查包括多样性领导者和机构多样性计划的问题;机构的 URM 定义;该定义的应用;以及多样性领导者对各种族/族裔群体代表性和机构贡献的看法。作者使用描述性统计分析来分析结果。
在 106 名受邀的多样性领导者中,有 89 名(84.0%)做出了回应,有 78 名(73.6%)提供了 URM 的工作定义。大多数计划(40/78;51%)使用 2003 年 AAMC 对 URM 的定义,该定义包括在医学领域相对于当地和全国人口统计学数据代表性不足的种族/族裔群体。只有 14.1%(11/78)使用了 2003 年前的 AAMC 定义,其中仅包括非裔美国人、墨西哥裔美国人、美国原住民和波多黎各大陆人。大约三分之一(23/78;29.5%)也在定义 URM 时考虑了其他多样性因素,例如社会经济地位、性取向和残疾。58 名受访者(74.4%)确认他们的多样性计划针对特定群体。
美国 AHC 多样性计划中使用的 URM 定义差异很大。尽管有些将 URM 按种族/族裔类别分类,但大多数人更广泛地定义 URM,以包含其他人口统计学和个人特征。这种转变应使学术医学做好准备,以消除健康差距并满足日益多样化人口的健康需求。