Cancer and Inflammation Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland.
Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 1;78(3):593-602. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2727. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
How do Ras isoforms attain oncogenic specificity at the membrane? Oncogenic KRas, HRas, and NRas (K-Ras, H-Ras, and N-Ras) differentially populate distinct cancers. How they selectively activate effectors and why is KRas4B the most prevalent are highly significant questions. Here, we consider determinants that may bias isoform-specific effector activation and signaling at the membrane. We merge functional data with a conformational view to provide mechanistic insight. Cell-specific expression levels, pathway cross-talk, and distinct interactions are the key, but conformational trends can modulate selectivity. There are two major pathways in oncogenic Ras-driven proliferation: MAPK (Raf/MEK/ERK) and PI3Kα/Akt/mTOR. All membrane-anchored, proximally located, oncogenic Ras isoforms can promote Raf dimerization and fully activate MAPK signaling. So why the differential statistics of oncogenic isoforms in distinct cancers and what makes KRas so highly oncogenic? Many cell-specific factors may be at play, including higher mRNA levels. As a key factor, we suggest that because only KRas4B binds calmodulin, only KRas can fully activate PI3Kα/Akt signaling. We propose that full activation of both MAPK and PI3Kα/Akt proliferative pathways by oncogenic KRas4B-but not by HRas or NRas-may help explain why the KRas4B isoform is especially highly populated in certain cancers. We further discuss pharmacologic implications. .
致癌 Ras 异构体如何在膜上获得致癌特异性?致癌 KRas、HRas 和 NRas(K-Ras、H-Ras 和 N-Ras)在不同的癌症中差异分布。它们如何选择性地激活效应物,以及为什么 KRas4B 最为普遍,这些都是非常重要的问题。在这里,我们考虑了可能偏向异构体特异性效应物激活和膜上信号转导的决定因素。我们将功能数据与构象观点相结合,提供了机制上的见解。细胞特异性表达水平、途径交叉对话和独特的相互作用是关键,但构象趋势可以调节选择性。致癌 Ras 驱动增殖中有两条主要途径:MAPK(Raf/MEK/ERK)和 PI3Kα/Akt/mTOR。所有膜锚定的、靠近的致癌 Ras 异构体都可以促进 Raf 二聚化并完全激活 MAPK 信号转导。那么,为什么不同癌症中致癌异构体的统计数据存在差异,以及为什么 KRas 如此致癌呢?许多细胞特异性因素可能在起作用,包括更高的 mRNA 水平。作为一个关键因素,我们认为,由于只有 KRas4B 与钙调蛋白结合,只有 KRas 才能完全激活 PI3Kα/Akt 信号转导。我们提出,致癌 KRas4B 可以完全激活 MAPK 和 PI3Kα/Akt 增殖途径,而 HRas 或 NRas 则不能,这可能有助于解释为什么 KRas4B 异构体在某些癌症中特别普遍。我们进一步讨论了药理学意义。