• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic review.患者参与青少年精神卫生保健:系统综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018800.
2
User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: a systematic review.患者参与青少年精神卫生保健:系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;31(11):1765-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01818-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
3
Exploring adolescents' perspectives on and experiences with post-primary school-based suicide prevention: a meta-ethnography protocol.探索青少年对基于中学后阶段的自杀预防的看法和体验:一项荟萃元分析研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 11;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02166-1.
4
Role of optimism in adolescent mental health: a protocol for a systematic review.乐观主义在青少年心理健康中的作用:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 7;10(7):e036177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036177.
5
Mediators and theories of change in psychotherapy with adolescents: a systematic review protocol.心理治疗青少年中中介和变化理论的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 5;11(3):e042411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042411.
6
Educational and training interventions aimed at healthcare workers in the detection and management of people with mental health conditions in South and Southeast Asia: systematic review protocol.针对南亚和东南亚医护人员开展的精神健康问题识别与管理教育培训干预措施的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 2;11(7):e045615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045615.
7
Shared decision making interventions in mental healthcare: a protocol for an umbrella review.精神卫生保健中的共享决策干预措施:伞式综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):e051283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051283.
8
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
9
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.以用户为中心的设计与患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-11.
10
Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise.迈向高质量、实用的儿童和青少年精神障碍实践指南:系统评价与共识达成的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 6;8(2):e018053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018053.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescents' involvement in mental health treatment and service design: a systematic review.青少年参与心理健康治疗和服务设计:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11892-2.
2
Key features of adolescent inpatient units and development of a checklist to improve consistency in reporting of settings.青少年住院病房的主要特征以及制定清单以提高环境报告一致性的方法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Feb;30(1):74-100. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12856. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Involvement of adolescent representatives and coresearchers in mental health research: Experiences from a research project.青少年代表和核心研究人员参与心理健康研究:来自一个研究项目的经验。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):322-332. doi: 10.1111/hex.13383. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: a systematic review.患者参与青少年精神卫生保健:系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;31(11):1765-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01818-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making in Youth Mental Health Care: Using the Evidence to Plan Treatments Collaboratively.青少年心理健康照护中的共同决策:运用证据共同规划治疗方案。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Sep-Oct;47(5):821-831. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1247358. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
2
Supporting public involvement in interview and other panels: a systematic review.支持公众参与访谈和其他小组讨论:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):807-817. doi: 10.1111/hex.12491. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
User involvement in the implementation of clinical guidelines for common mental health disorders: a review and compilation of strategies and resources.用户参与常见精神健康障碍临床指南的实施:策略与资源的综述及汇编
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Aug 9;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0135-y.
4
Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家中服务使用者及照护者参与精神卫生系统强化工作的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 1;16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1323-8.
5
Service user involvement in preregistration general nurse education: a systematic review.服务使用者参与注册前普通护士教育:一项系统综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jan;25(1-2):53-69. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13068. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
End-user involvement in a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research of non-pharmacological interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder delivered in school settings: reflections on the impacts and challenges.最终用户参与对学校环境中针对注意力缺陷多动障碍的非药物干预的定量和定性研究的系统评价:对影响和挑战的思考
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1084-97. doi: 10.1111/hex.12400. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Patient involvement in Europe--a comparative framework.欧洲的患者参与——一个比较框架。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(5):546-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2015-0078.
8
Patient-centered, Person-centered, and Person-directed Care: They are Not the Same.以患者为中心、以人为本和以个人为导向的护理:它们并不相同。
Med Care. 2015 Jul;53(7):561-3. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000387.
9
Service users on interview panels in mental health.精神健康领域面试小组中的服务使用者。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Jun;24(3):281-2. doi: 10.1111/inm.12115.
10
User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update.用户参与Cochrane系统评价:运用结构化方法提升系统评价更新的临床相关性、实用性和易用性。
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 20;4:55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0023-5.

患者参与青少年精神卫生保健:系统综述方案。

User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Department of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018800.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018800
PMID:29273667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778296/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

User involvement has become a growing importance in healthcare. The United Nations state that adolescents have a right to be heard, and user involvement in healthcare is a legal right in many countries. Some research provides an insight into the field of user involvement in somatic and mental healthcare for adults, but little is known about user involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare, and no overview of the existing research evidence exists.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of existing research reporting on experiences with and the effectiveness and safety issues associated with user involvement for adolescents' mental healthcare at the individual and organisational level. A systematic literature search and assessment of published research in the field of user involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare will be carried out. Established guidelines will be used for data extraction (Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)), critical appraisal (Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary) and reporting of results (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and CASP). Confidence in the research evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Adolescents are included as coresearchers for the planning and carrying out of this systematic review. This systematic review will provide an overview of the existing research literature and thereby fill a knowledge gap. It may provide various stakeholders, including decision-makers, professionals, individuals and their families, with an overview of existing knowledge in an underexplored field of research.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review as we are not collecting primary data. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and at conference presentations and will be shared with stakeholder groups.

摘要

简介

用户参与在医疗保健领域变得越来越重要。联合国规定,青少年有权发表意见,并且在许多国家,用户参与医疗保健是一项合法权利。一些研究深入探讨了成人躯体和心理健康护理领域的用户参与问题,但对于青少年心理健康护理中的用户参与知之甚少,也没有关于现有研究证据的概述。

方法和分析

本系统评价的目的是概述现有的研究报告,这些报告涉及青少年心理健康护理中与个人和组织层面的用户参与相关的经验、效果和安全问题。将对青少年心理健康护理领域中用户参与的现有研究进行系统文献检索和评估。将使用既定指南进行数据提取(Cochrane 协作指南、观察性研究的加强报告标准和批判性评估技能计划 (CASP))、批判性评估(Cochrane 协作指南和实用-解释连续性指标摘要)以及结果报告(系统评价和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目、临床试验的统一报告标准和 CASP)。使用推荐评估、制定和评价方法来评估研究证据的可信度。青少年将作为核心研究人员参与本系统评价的规划和实施。本系统评价将提供现有研究文献的概述,从而填补知识空白。它可以为决策者、专业人员、个人及其家属等各种利益相关者提供一个在研究领域尚未充分探索的现有知识概述。

伦理和传播

由于本系统评价不收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。结果将在同行评议的期刊上发表,并在会议上展示,并与利益相关者团体分享。