• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向高质量、实用的儿童和青少年精神障碍实践指南:系统评价与共识达成的方案

Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise.

作者信息

Bennett Kathryn, Duda Stephanie, Brouwers Melissa, Szatmari Peter, Newton Amanda, McLennan John, Sundar Purnima, Cleverley Kristin, Charach Alice, Henderson Joanna, Courtney Darren, Rice Maureen

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 6;8(2):e018053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018053.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018053
PMID:29437752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5829788/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The quality of clinical practice guidelines (PGs) has not been evaluated in child and youth mental health (CYMH). To address this gap, we will: (1) conduct a systematic review (SR) to answer the question 'among eligible PGs relevant to the prevention or treatment of CYMH conditions, which PGs meet criteria for minimum and high quality?'; (2) apply nominal group methods to create recommendations for how CYMH PG quality, completeness and usefulness can be strengthened.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SR: Potentially eligible PGs will be identified in 12 databases using a reproducible search strategy developed by a research librarian. Trained raters will: (1) apply prespecified criteria to identify eligible PGs relevant to depression, anxiety, suicidality, bipolar disorder, behaviour disorder (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder) and substance use disorder; (2) extract descriptive data and (3) assess PG quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. Scores on three AGREE II domains (rigour of development, stakeholder involvement, editorial independence) will designate PGs as minimum (≥50%) or high quality (≥70%). Nominal group: Four CYMH PG knowledge user groups (clinicians, mental health service planners, youth and adult family members) will participate in structured exercises derived using nominal group methods to generate recommendations to improve PG quality, completeness and usefulness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required. Study products will be disseminated as follows. A cross-platform website will house eligible CYMH PGs and their quality ratings. Twitter and Facebook tools will promote it to a wide variety of PG users. Data from Google Analytics, Twitonomy and Altmetrics will inform usage evaluation. Complementary educational workshops will be conducted for CYMH professionals. Print materials and journal articles will be produced.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017060738.

摘要

引言

儿童和青少年心理健康(CYMH)领域的临床实践指南(PGs)质量尚未得到评估。为填补这一空白,我们将:(1)进行一项系统评价(SR),以回答“在与CYMH疾病预防或治疗相关的合格PGs中,哪些PGs符合最低质量和高质量标准?”这一问题;(2)应用名义群体法,就如何加强CYMH PG的质量、完整性和实用性提出建议。

方法与分析

系统评价:将使用由研究馆员制定的可重复搜索策略,在12个数据库中识别潜在合格的PGs。经过培训的评估人员将:(1)应用预先设定的标准,识别与抑郁症、焦虑症、自杀倾向、双相情感障碍、行为障碍(注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍、品行障碍)和物质使用障碍相关的合格PGs;(2)提取描述性数据;(3)使用《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE II)工具评估PG质量。AGREE II三个领域(制定的严谨性、利益相关者参与度、编辑独立性)的得分将把PGs指定为最低质量(≥50%)或高质量(≥70%)。名义群体:四个CYMH PG知识用户群体(临床医生、心理健康服务规划者、青少年和成年家庭成员)将参与使用名义群体法得出的结构化练习,以生成改进PG质量、完整性和实用性的建议。

伦理与传播

无需伦理批准。研究成果将按以下方式传播。一个跨平台网站将收录合格CYMH PGs及其质量评级。推特和脸书工具将向各类PG用户推广该网站。来自谷歌分析、推特分析和替代计量学的数据将为使用评估提供信息。将为CYMH专业人员举办补充教育研讨会。将制作印刷材料和期刊文章。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017060738。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/5829788/26ea5cec6508/bmjopen-2017-018053f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/5829788/1f09f95a1142/bmjopen-2017-018053f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/5829788/26ea5cec6508/bmjopen-2017-018053f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/5829788/1f09f95a1142/bmjopen-2017-018053f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/5829788/26ea5cec6508/bmjopen-2017-018053f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise.迈向高质量、实用的儿童和青少年精神障碍实践指南:系统评价与共识达成的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 6;8(2):e018053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018053.
2
An appraisal of the trustworthiness of practice guidelines for depression and anxiety in children and youth.评估儿童和青少年抑郁焦虑症实践指南的可信度。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):530-540. doi: 10.1002/da.22752. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Practitioner Review: On the trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines - a systematic review of the quality of methods used to develop guidelines in child and youth mental health.从业者评论:临床实践指南的可信度 - 系统评价儿童和青少年心理健康指南制定方法的质量。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;57(6):662-73. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12547. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
4
Is the National Guideline Clearinghouse a Trustworthy Source of Practice Guidelines for Child and Youth Anxiety and Depression?国家指南交换中心是儿童和青少年焦虑症与抑郁症实践指南的可靠来源吗?
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;26(2):86-97. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Children and Youth with Disruptive Behavior: Rigor of Development and Recommendations for Use.一项针对有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年的临床实践指南的系统评价和评估:制定的严谨性和使用建议。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;22(4):527-548. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00292-2.
6
Diagnosis and treatment for hyperuricaemia and gout: a protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements.高尿酸血症和痛风的诊断与治疗:临床实践指南和共识声明系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e014928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014928.
7
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
8
Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behavioural problems in children living in low- and middle-income countries: study protocol of a systematic review.中低收入国家儿童破坏性行为问题的社会心理干预:一项系统评价的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 May 20;5(5):e007377. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007377.
9
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub2.
10
Canadian guidelines on pharmacotherapy for disruptive and aggressive behaviour in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or conduct disorder.加拿大关于注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍或品行障碍的儿童及青少年破坏性行为和攻击性行为药物治疗的指南。
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;60(2):62-76. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000204.

引用本文的文献

1
Eating, sleeping and moving recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric depression: umbrella review.儿科抑郁症临床实践指南中的饮食、睡眠和运动建议:综合综述
BJPsych Open. 2021 Oct 5;7(6):e185. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1020.
2
Problem-solving training as an active ingredient of treatment for youth depression: a scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis.问题解决训练作为青少年抑郁症治疗的一种活性成分:系统评价和探索性荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 24;21(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03260-9.
3
A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Children and Youth with Disruptive Behavior: Rigor of Development and Recommendations for Use.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing patient-oriented tools that could be packaged with guidelines to promote self-management and guideline adoption: a meta-review.确定可与指南配套以促进自我管理和指南采用的以患者为导向的工具:一项元综述。
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 14;11:52. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0419-1.
2
Practitioner Review: On the trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines - a systematic review of the quality of methods used to develop guidelines in child and youth mental health.从业者评论:临床实践指南的可信度 - 系统评价儿童和青少年心理健康指南制定方法的质量。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;57(6):662-73. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12547. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
3
一项针对有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年的临床实践指南的系统评价和评估:制定的严谨性和使用建议。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;22(4):527-548. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00292-2.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
4
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与:理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
5
How to decide whether a clinical practice guideline is trustworthy.如何判断临床实践指南是否可信。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 9;309(2):139-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.156703.
6
Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet institute of medicine standards: Two more decades of little, if any, progress.临床实践指南未能达到医学研究所的标准:又过去了二十年,进展甚微,即便有进展也微乎其微。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 26;172(21):1628-33. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.56.
7
Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs.患者和公众参与临床实践指南:现有项目的知识综合。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):E45-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11424401. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
8
Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A).美国青少年终身精神障碍的服务利用情况:国家共病调查-青少年增补调查(NCS-A)的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;50(1):32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
9
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评估研究的系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042077.
10
Comparison of determinants of research knowledge utilization by practitioners and administrators in the field of child and family social services.比较儿童和家庭社会服务领域的从业者和管理人员在研究知识利用方面的决定因素。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jun 3;5:41. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-41.