Miller Ralph R, Polack Cody W
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States.
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States.
Behav Processes. 2018 Sep;154:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
A basic assumption of most researchers is that behavior is generally functional, and indeed, in most instances the function is obvious. But in a number of cases, some behaviors of neurophysiologically 'normal' organisms appear to be maladaptive. Considerable research has been conducted to understand the basis of such behavior as well as how the frequency of such behavior can be reduced. Here we provide a brief panoramic review of the major sources of maladaptive behavior in neurophysiologically 'normal' organisms: a) altered environmental contingencies relative to those faced by ancestral generations in their environment of evolutionary adaptation, b) altered environmental contingencies within the lifespan of the animal, c) linked behaviors in which the dysfunctional behavior is a linked companion of a more valuable beneficial trait, and d) the labeling of some behaviors as 'maladaptive' when more careful examination finds that they provide net benefit. Most of our attention is on the consequences of altered contingencies across and within a generation, with altered contingencies within a generation constituting a form of associative interference. The central issue in these two cases can be framed in terms of insufficient or excessive transfer of training resulting in maladaptive behavior. We discuss the functional basis of successful and unsuccessful near transfer (i.e., stimulus and response generalization) and far transfer (including rule learning and abstraction).
大多数研究人员的一个基本假设是,行为通常具有功能性,而且实际上,在大多数情况下其功能是显而易见的。但在许多情况下,神经生理学上 “正常” 的生物体的某些行为似乎是适应不良的。已经进行了大量研究,以了解此类行为的基础以及如何降低此类行为的发生频率。在此,我们简要全面地回顾一下神经生理学上 “正常” 的生物体中适应不良行为的主要来源:a)相对于其在进化适应环境中祖先所面临的环境意外情况而言发生了改变的环境意外情况;b)在动物寿命期间发生了改变的环境意外情况;c)关联行为,其中功能失调行为是更有价值的有益特征的关联伴随物;d)当更仔细检查发现某些行为能带来净收益时却将其标记为 “适应不良”。我们大部分注意力集中在跨代和代内环境意外情况改变的后果上,代内环境意外情况改变构成一种联想干扰形式。这两种情况下的核心问题可以用训练转移不足或过度导致适应不良行为来阐述。我们讨论了成功和不成功的近迁移(即刺激和反应泛化)以及远迁移(包括规则学习和抽象)的功能基础。