Suppr超能文献

髂筋膜间隙阻滞与不进行阻滞用于下肢手术后疼痛控制的Meta分析

Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yang Linyi, Li Min, Chen Chen, Shen Jiang, Bu Xiaoxuan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2017 Dec 14;10:2833-2841. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S149647. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) versus no block (NB) after lower limb surgery (LLS) is still controversial, so we performed this meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By searching the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by July 20, 2017), randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effect of FICB versus NB in patients receiving LLS were identified. The primary outcome was the pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after LLS. The dosage of morphine at 24 h was also collected. The side effect of anesthesia was assessed according to the occurrence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Data from 7 clinical trials that included 508 patients were summarized. The results showed that patients receiving FICB had lower pain scores at 4 h (mean difference [MD]=-1.17; 95% CI=-2.30 to -0.05; =0.041), 12 h (MD=-0.41; 95% CI=-0.76 to -0.05; =0.026) and 24 h (MD=-0.96; 95% CI=-1.77 to -0.15; =0.020) after LLS. Besides, FICB could reduce the dosage of morphine at 24 h (MD=-2.06; 95% CI=-3.82 to -0.30; =0.022) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk rate=0.44, 95% CI=0.24-0.80, =0.008).

CONCLUSION

Compared with NB, FICB is an effective and safe method for alleviating the pain after LLS. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this finding.

摘要

背景

下肢手术(LLS)后,髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)与不进行阻滞(NB)的镇痛效果仍存在争议,因此我们进行了这项荟萃分析。

材料与方法

通过检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆(截至2017年7月20日的最新更新),确定了比较FICB与NB对接受LLS患者镇痛效果的随机对照试验。主要结局是LLS后4、12和24小时的疼痛评分。还收集了24小时吗啡用量。根据术后恶心呕吐发生率评估麻醉副作用。

结果

总结了7项包含508例患者的临床试验数据。结果显示,接受FICB的患者在LLS后4小时(平均差[MD]= -1.17;95%可信区间[CI]= -2.30至-0.05;P = 0.041)、12小时(MD = -0.41;95% CI = -0.76至-0.05;P = 0.026)和24小时(MD = -0.96;95% CI = -1.77至-0.15;P = 0.020)的疼痛评分较低。此外,FICB可降低24小时吗啡用量(MD = -2.06;95% CI = -3.82至-0.30;P = 0.022)以及术后恶心呕吐发生率(相对危险率= 0.44,95% CI = 0.24 - 0.80,P = 0.008)。

结论

与NB相比,FICB是缓解LLS后疼痛的一种有效且安全的方法。需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来证实这一发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5734232/f1294441c8fe/jpr-10-2833Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验