School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Learning Futures, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2018 Jun;57(2):186-202. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12168. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
Self-report studies show that negative emotional states and ineffective use of emotion regulation strategies are key maintaining factors of substance use disorders (SUD). However, experimental research into emotional processing in adults with SUD is in its infancy. Theoretical conceptualizations of emotion regulation have shifted from a focus on individual (internal) processes to one that encompasses social and interpersonal functions - including the regulation of facial expression of emotion. The purpose of this study was to examine the individual and interpersonal emotion regulation capacity of 35 adults in residential treatment diagnosed with a SUD compared to 35 demographically matched controls (both samples M = 25 years; 37% females).
Participants completed a facial emotion expression flexibility task while viewing emotive images, as well as the Difficulties of Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the Social (Emotion) Expectancy Scale (SES).
Adults in SUD treatment experienced significantly more emotion regulation difficulties on all DERS subscales than controls. They also reported higher levels of negative self-evaluation and social expectancies not to feel negative emotions (anxiety and depression) compared to controls. Moreover, when viewing emotive images, the treatment sample showed significantly less flexibility of their emotional expression compared to the control sample.
These findings demonstrate that the awareness, expression, and regulation of emotions are particularly difficult for people with SUD and this may maintain their substance use and provide an important target for treatment.
Compared to matched controls, adults with substance use disorders self-report significantly more difficulties with emotional awareness and regulation. Compared to matched controls, adults with substance use disorders report significantly greater expectancies not to show depression and anxiety. When viewing positive and negative images, adults with substance use disorders are significantly less flexible in their facial expression of emotion than matched controls in response to regulatory instructions. Emotion regulation should be measured and addressed as part of substance use disorder treatment.
自我报告研究表明,消极情绪状态和无效的情绪调节策略是物质使用障碍(SUD)的关键维持因素。然而,对 SUD 成年人情绪处理的实验研究还处于起步阶段。情绪调节的理论概念已经从关注个体(内部)过程转变为包括社会和人际功能——包括情绪的面部表达调节。本研究旨在比较 35 名接受住院治疗的 SUD 成年人和 35 名人口统计学匹配的对照组(两个样本的 M = 25 岁;37%女性)的个体和人际情绪调节能力。
参与者在观看情感图像时完成了面部情绪表达灵活性任务,同时还完成了情绪调节困难量表(DERS)和社会(情绪)期望量表(SES)。
与对照组相比,接受 SUD 治疗的成年人在所有 DERS 分量表上的情绪调节困难明显更大。与对照组相比,他们还报告了更高的负面自我评估和不期望感到负面情绪(焦虑和抑郁)的社会期望。此外,与对照组相比,治疗组在观看情感图像时,情绪表达的灵活性明显较低。
这些发现表明,SUD 患者对情绪的感知、表达和调节特别困难,这可能会维持他们的物质使用,并为治疗提供一个重要的目标。
与匹配对照组相比,物质使用障碍患者自我报告的情绪意识和调节困难明显更大。与匹配对照组相比,物质使用障碍患者报告的不表现出抑郁和焦虑的期望明显更大。在观看正性和负性图像时,与匹配对照组相比,物质使用障碍患者在对调节指令做出反应时,情绪的面部表达灵活性明显较低。情绪调节应作为物质使用障碍治疗的一部分进行测量和处理。