Pereira Lorena M S, Sordi Mariane B, Magini Ricardo S, Calazans Duarte Antônio R, Souza Júlio C M
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal/RN, 59060-000, Brazil.
Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry (ODT), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis/SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Eur J Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):553-558. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_162_17.
The aim of this study was to perform an integrative review of the literature on the clinically usual prosthesis-abutment misfit over implant-supported structures manufactured by conventional casting technique. The present integrative review used the PRISMA methodology. A bibliographical search was conducted on the following electronic databases: MEDLINE/PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Scopus (Elsevier), ScienceDirect (Elsevier), Web of Science (Thomson Reuters Scientific), Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME), and Virtual Health Library (BVS). A total of 11 relevant studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The prosthetic-abutment vertical misfit considered clinically usual ranged from 50 to 160 μm. The vertical misfit depends on several steps during technical manufacturing techniques, which includes the materials and technical procedures. Lower values in misfit are recorded when precious metal or titanium alloys are utilized. Although a vertical misfit mean value of 100 μm has been considered clinically usual, most of the previous studies included in this revision showed lower mean values.
本研究的目的是对有关通过传统铸造技术制造的种植体支持结构上临床上常见的修复体-基台不匹配的文献进行综合综述。本综合综述采用PRISMA方法。在以下电子数据库中进行了文献检索:MEDLINE/PubMed(美国国立医学图书馆)、Scopus(爱思唯尔)、ScienceDirect(爱思唯尔)、Web of Science(汤森路透科学公司)、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学信息中心(BIREME)以及虚拟健康图书馆(BVS)。总共选择了11项相关研究进行定性分析。临床上认为常见的修复体-基台垂直不匹配范围为50至160μm。垂直不匹配取决于技术制造过程中的几个步骤,包括材料和技术程序。使用贵金属或钛合金时,不匹配值较低。尽管临床上通常认为垂直不匹配的平均值为100μm,但本综述中纳入的大多数先前研究显示出较低的平均值。