• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心研究 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗策略的实施。

Multisite Investigation of Strategies for the Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Center for Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;104(4):664-674. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1006. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

DOI:
10.1002/cpt.1006
PMID:29280137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6019555/
Abstract

CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention is increasingly implemented in clinical practice. However, challenges such as selecting a testing platform, communicating test results, building clinical decision support processes, providing patient and provider education, and integrating methods to support the translation of emerging evidence to clinical practice are barriers to broad adoption. In this report, we compare and contrast implementation strategies of 12 early adopters, describing solutions to common problems and initial performance metrics for each program. Key differences between programs included the test result turnaround time and timing of therapy changes, which are both related to the CYP2C19 testing model and platform used. Sites reported the need for new informatics infrastructure, expert clinicians such as pharmacists to interpret results, physician champions, and ongoing education. Consensus lessons learned are presented to provide a path forward for those seeking to implement similar clinical pharmacogenomics programs within their institutions.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,CYP2C19 基因型指导的抗血小板治疗在临床实践中得到了越来越多的应用。然而,选择检测平台、沟通检测结果、构建临床决策支持流程、提供患者和医生教育以及整合方法以支持新兴证据转化为临床实践等方面的挑战,阻碍了其广泛应用。在本报告中,我们比较和对比了 12 个早期采用者的实施策略,描述了每个项目常见问题的解决方案和初步绩效指标。项目之间的主要差异包括检测结果的周转时间和治疗改变的时间,这两者都与 CYP2C19 检测模型和使用的平台有关。各站点报告称需要新的信息学基础设施、药剂师等专家临床医生来解读结果、医生拥护者以及持续的教育。我们提出了达成共识的经验教训,为那些希望在其机构内实施类似临床药物基因组学项目的人提供了前进的道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca72/6019555/8e5fe9136645/nihms931774f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca72/6019555/af37f6939291/nihms931774f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca72/6019555/8e5fe9136645/nihms931774f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca72/6019555/af37f6939291/nihms931774f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca72/6019555/8e5fe9136645/nihms931774f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Multisite Investigation of Strategies for the Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy.多中心研究 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗策略的实施。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;104(4):664-674. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1006. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多中心研究:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实施 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
Impact of the CYP2C19*17 Allele on Outcomes in Patients Receiving Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CYP2C19*17 等位基因对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受基于基因型的抗血小板治疗患者结局的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):705-715. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2039. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Sustainability of Using Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用基于基因型的抗血小板治疗的临床结果和可持续性。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Apr;11(4):e002069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002069.
5
Economic Evaluations of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy Compared to the Universal Use of Antiplatelets in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征患者普遍使用抗血小板药物的经济学评价:系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;25(3):201-211. doi: 10.1177/1074248420902298. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
6
CYP2C19 Genotype is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome in Iraqi Patients on Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CYP2C19基因分型是伊拉克经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后服用氯吡格雷患者不良心血管结局的独立预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;71(6):347-351. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000577.
7
CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CYP2C19功能缺失和功能增强指导下的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗:一项成本效益分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb;31(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y.
8
Advances in the Pharmacogenomics of Antiplatelet Therapy.抗血小板治疗的药物基因组学进展。
Am J Ther. 2020 Sep/Oct;27(5):e477-e484. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001013.
9
CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics versus standard of care dosing for selecting antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.CYP2C19药物遗传学与冠心病患者抗血小板治疗选择的标准剂量给药:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1246-1252. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27949. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Clinical outcomes of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy: existing evidence and future directions.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗的临床结局:现有证据与未来方向。
Pharmacogenomics. 2018 Aug 1;19(13):1039-1046. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0072. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenetics: Opportunities for the Research Program and Other Large Data Sets to Advance the Field.药物遗传学:研究项目及其他大型数据集推动该领域发展的机遇
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jan;65(1):111-130. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061724-080718.
2
CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗与接受神经介入手术患者的临床结局
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70131. doi: 10.1111/cts.70131.
3
Decoding Pharmacogenomic Test Interpretation and Application to Patient Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data.基于真实世界数据的 CYP2C19 指导的抗血小板治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的成本效益。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Oct;20(5):724-735. doi: 10.1038/s41397-020-0162-5. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多中心研究:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实施 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
3
解读药物基因组学检测结果及其在患者护理中的应用。
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024 Jun;7(6):581-588. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1958. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
The Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network Implementation Working Group: global collaboration to advance pharmacogenetic implementation.药物基因组学全球研究网络实施工作组:全球合作推进药物基因组学实施。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000547. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
5
Real-world evaluation of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.颅内动脉瘤修复术后患者的抗血小板治疗的真实世界评估。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(12-13):503-513. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Review Topic of the Week.基于基因型的抗血小板治疗:JACC 本周综述主题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Sep 17;84(12):1107-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.038.
7
Genetic Determinants of Response to P2Y Inhibitors and Clinical Implications.P2Y 抑制剂反应的遗传决定因素及临床意义。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2024 Oct;13(4):469-481. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
8
Development of a Multifaceted Program for Pharmacogenetics Adoption at an Academic Medical Center: Practical Considerations and Lessons Learned.制定一个综合性的药物基因组学采用计划,在学术医疗中心:实际考虑和经验教训。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Oct;116(4):914-931. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3402. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
9
Precision Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Precision PCI) Registry - Informing optimal antiplatelet strategies.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的精准抗血小板治疗(Precision PCI)注册研究——为优化抗血小板策略提供信息。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e70004. doi: 10.1111/cts.70004.
10
Strategies for DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the US.美国氟嘧啶类化疗前 DPYD 检测的策略。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jul 9;32(8):497. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08674-1.
Role of genetic testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
基因检测在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的作用。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;11(2):151-164. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1353909. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Preemptive Panel-Based Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Time is Now.抢先进行基于面板的药物遗传学检测:现在正是时候。
Pharm Res. 2017 Aug;34(8):1551-1555. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2163-x. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Institutional profile: University of Florida Health Personalized Medicine Program.机构简介:佛罗里达大学健康个性化医疗项目
Pharmacogenomics. 2017 Apr;18(5):421-426. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0028. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
The IGNITE Pharmacogenetics Working Group: An Opportunity for Building Evidence with Pharmacogenetic Implementation in a Real-World Setting.IGNITE药物遗传学工作组:在现实环境中通过药物遗传学实施建立证据的契机。
Clin Transl Sci. 2017 May;10(3):143-146. doi: 10.1111/cts.12456. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Precision Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: Laying the Foundational Processes Through Implementation of Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy.阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校的精准医学:通过实施基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗奠定基础流程
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;102(3):493-501. doi: 10.1002/cpt.631. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Participant-perceived understanding and perspectives on pharmacogenomics: the Mayo Clinic RIGHT protocol (Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time).参与者对药物基因组学的理解和看法:梅奥诊所 RIGHT 方案(正确的药物、正确的剂量、正确的时间)。
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):819-825. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.192. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
9
Educational strategies to enable expansion of pharmacogenomics-based care.促进基于药物基因组学的医疗服务扩展的教育策略。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):1986-1998. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160104.
10
Implementation of inpatient models of pharmacogenetics programs.住院患者药物遗传学项目模型的实施。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):1944-1954. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150946.