Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical/Universidade Nova de Lisboa (IHMT/UNL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
AIDS. 2018 Mar 13;32(5):543-554. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001728.
: Because HIV is a fast-evolving virus, HIV genomic sequences of several individuals can be used to investigate whether they belong to a transmission network. Since the infamous 'Florida dentist case' in the beginning of the 1990s, phylogenetic analyses has been recurrently used in court settings as a forensic tool in HIV transmission investigations, for example cases where one or more complainants allege that a defendant has unlawfully infected them with HIV. Such cases can arise both in the context of HIV-specific criminal laws - in countries where transmission of HIV infection is specifically criminalized - or in the context of general laws, for example, by applying physical or sexual assault laws to HIV-related cases. Although phylogenetic analysis as a forensic technique for HIV transmission investigations has become common in several countries, the methodologies have not yet been standardized, sometimes giving rise to unwarranted conclusions. In this literature review, we revisit HIV court case investigations published in the scientific literature, as well as the methodological aspects important for the application and standardization of phylogenetic analyses methods as a forensic tool. Phylogenetic methodologies are improving quickly, such that more recently, phylogenetic relatedness, directionality of transmission and timing of nodes in the tree are used to assess whether the phylogenetic transmission analysis is consistent with or contradicting the charges. We find that there has been a lack of consistency between methods used in court case investigations and that it is essential to define guidelines to be used by phylogenetic forensic experts in HIV transmission cases in court.
由于 HIV 是一种快速进化的病毒,因此可以使用多个个体的 HIV 基因组序列来调查它们是否属于传播网络。自 20 世纪 90 年代初臭名昭著的“佛罗里达牙医案”以来,系统发育分析已被反复用于法庭环境中,作为 HIV 传播调查的法医工具,例如,有一个或多个投诉人指控被告非法将 HIV 感染给他们的情况。这种情况可能出现在 HIV 特定刑法的背景下——在某些国家,HIV 感染的传播被专门定罪——或一般法律的背景下,例如,将身体或性攻击法应用于与 HIV 相关的案件。尽管作为 HIV 传播调查的法医技术,系统发育分析在几个国家已经很常见,但该方法尚未标准化,有时会得出不合理的结论。在这篇文献综述中,我们重新审视了科学文献中发表的 HIV 法庭案件调查,以及作为法医工具应用和标准化系统发育分析方法的重要方法学方面。系统发育方法学正在迅速改进,因此,最近使用系统发育相关性、传播方向和树中节点的时间来评估系统发育传播分析是否与指控一致或矛盾。我们发现,法庭案件调查中使用的方法之间缺乏一致性,因此必须为法庭上 HIV 传播案件中的系统发育法医专家定义指南。