• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用数据分析设计更高效、有效和安全的医疗急救团队(MET)服务。

Designing a more efficient, effective and safe Medical Emergency Team (MET) service using data analysis.

作者信息

Bergmeir Christoph, Bilgrami Irma, Bain Christopher, Webb Geoffrey I, Orosz Judit, Pilcher David

机构信息

Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Intensive Care Specialist, Departments of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Western Health, Gordon Street, Footscray, Vic, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0188688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188688. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0188688
PMID:29281665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5744916/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hospitals have seen a rise in Medical Emergency Team (MET) reviews. We hypothesised that the commonest MET calls result in similar treatments. Our aim was to design a pre-emptive management algorithm that allowed direct institution of treatment to patients without having to wait for attendance of the MET team and to model its potential impact on MET call incidence and patient outcomes.

METHODS

Data was extracted for all MET calls from the hospital database. Association rule data mining techniques were used to identify the most common combinations of MET call causes, outcomes and therapies.

RESULTS

There were 13,656 MET calls during the 34-month study period in 7936 patients. The most common MET call was for hypotension [31%, (2459/7936)]. These MET calls were strongly associated with the immediate administration of intra-venous fluid (70% [1714/2459] v 13% [739/5477] p<0.001), unless the patient was located on a respiratory ward (adjusted OR 0.41 [95%CI 0.25-0.67] p<0.001), had a cardiac cause for admission (adjusted OR 0.61 [95%CI 0.50-0.75] p<0.001) or was under the care of the heart failure team (adjusted OR 0.29 [95%CI 0.19-0.42] p<0.001). Modelling the effect of a pre-emptive management algorithm for immediate fluid administration without MET activation on data from a test period of 24 months following the study period, suggested it would lead to a 68.7% (2541/3697) reduction in MET calls for hypotension and a 19.6% (2541/12938) reduction in total METs without adverse effects on patients.

CONCLUSION

Routinely collected data and analytic techniques can be used to develop a pre-emptive management algorithm to administer intravenous fluid therapy to a specific group of hypotensive patients without the need to initiate a MET call. This could both lead to earlier treatment for the patient and less total MET calls.

摘要

引言

医院中医疗急救团队(MET)会诊的数量有所增加。我们假设最常见的MET会诊会导致相似的治疗。我们的目标是设计一种抢先管理算法,使患者无需等待MET团队到场即可直接接受治疗,并模拟其对MET会诊发生率和患者预后的潜在影响。

方法

从医院数据库中提取所有MET会诊的数据。使用关联规则数据挖掘技术来识别MET会诊原因、结果和治疗方法的最常见组合。

结果

在为期34个月的研究期间,7936名患者中有13656次MET会诊。最常见的MET会诊原因是低血压[31%,(2459/7936)]。这些MET会诊与立即静脉输液密切相关(70%[1714/2459]对13%[739/5477],p<0.001),除非患者住在呼吸科病房(校正比值比0.41[95%置信区间0.25-0.67],p<0.001)、因心脏原因入院(校正比值比0.61[95%置信区间0.50-0.75],p<0.001)或由心力衰竭团队护理(校正比值比0.29[95%置信区间0.19-0.42],p<0.001)。对研究期后24个月测试期的数据进行建模,模拟在不启动MET的情况下立即进行液体管理的抢先管理算法的效果,结果表明这将使因低血压导致的MET会诊减少68.7%(2541/3697),使总的MET会诊减少19.6%(2541/12938),且对患者无不良影响。

结论

常规收集的数据和分析技术可用于开发一种抢先管理算法,为特定组的低血压患者进行静脉输液治疗,而无需启动MET会诊。这既能使患者得到更早的治疗,又能减少总的MET会诊次数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d2a/5744916/9e63742e6558/pone.0188688.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d2a/5744916/9e63742e6558/pone.0188688.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d2a/5744916/9e63742e6558/pone.0188688.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing a more efficient, effective and safe Medical Emergency Team (MET) service using data analysis.利用数据分析设计更高效、有效和安全的医疗急救团队(MET)服务。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0188688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188688. eCollection 2017.
2
Triggers for emergency team activation: a multicenter assessment.触发急救团队激活的因素:一项多中心评估。
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):359.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
3
Developing and evaluating the success of a family activated medical emergency team: a quality improvement report.建立并评估家庭激活医疗急救团队的成效:一份质量改进报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):203-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003001. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
4
The role of the non-ICU staff nurse on a medical emergency team: perceptions and understanding.非 ICU 护士在医疗急救团队中的作用:认知与理解。
Am J Nurs. 2011 May;111(5):22-9; quiz 30-1. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000398045.00299.64.
5
[Deployment of the in-hospital emergency team in a tertiary care university hospital : Data analysis for the time period 2013-2016 in North-Rhine/Westphalia].[三级护理大学医院院内应急团队的部署:北莱茵-威斯特法伦州2013 - 2016年时间段的数据分析]
Anaesthesist. 2019 Jun;68(6):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0586-y. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Intensive care without walls - introduction of a Medical Emergency Team system in a Swiss tertiary care centre.无墙重症监护——瑞士一家三级护理中心引入医疗急救团队系统
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Oct 8;144:w14027. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.14027. eCollection 2014.
7
The Medical Emergency Team system: a two hospital comparison.医疗应急团队系统:两家医院的比较。
Resuscitation. 2008 May;77(2):180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.11.016. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
Delayed Emergency Team Calls and Associated Hospital Mortality: A Multicenter Study.延迟的急诊团队呼叫与相关的医院死亡率:一项多中心研究
Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2059-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001192.
9
Activities of a Medical Emergency Team: a prospective observational study of 795 calls.医疗应急团队的活动:对795次呼叫的前瞻性观察研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 Jan;44(1):34-43. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1604400107.
10
The epidemiology and outcome of medical emergency team call patients treated with non-invasive ventilation.无创通气治疗的医疗急救团队呼叫患者的流行病学和转归。
Resuscitation. 2011 Sep;82(9):1218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Meeting medical emergency response criteria for hypertension is not associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality in a tertiary referral center.在三级转诊中心,达到高血压医疗紧急应对标准与院内死亡可能性增加无关。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 5;19:100679. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100679. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Blood pressure elevations in hospital.住院期间血压升高。
Aust Prescr. 2022 Dec;45(6):205-207. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.068. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Predicting clinical deterioration with Q-ADDS compared to NEWS, Between the Flags, and eCART track and trigger tools.

本文引用的文献

1
The epidemiology of adult Rapid Response Team patients in Australia.澳大利亚成年快速反应团队患者的流行病学情况。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Mar;42(2):213-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200208.
2
Mortality of rapid response team patients in Australia: a multicentre study.澳大利亚快速反应团队患者的死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Dec;15(4):273-8.
3
Rapid Response Team composition, resourcing and calling criteria in Australia.澳大利亚快速反应团队的组成、资源配置和呼叫标准。
与 NEWS、Between the Flags 和 eCART 轨迹和触发工具相比,使用 Q-ADDS 预测临床恶化。
Resuscitation. 2020 Aug;153:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Rapid response systems.快速反应系统。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
Resuscitation. 2012 May;83(5):563-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
4
Documenting Rapid Response System afferent limb failure and associated patient outcomes.记录快速反应系统传入支衰竭及相关患者转归。
Resuscitation. 2011 Jul;82(7):810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
5
Features and outcome of patients receiving multiple Medical Emergency Team reviews.接受多次医疗应急团队评估的患者的特征和结局。
Resuscitation. 2010 Nov;81(11):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
6
Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients.危重症患者血管内容量评估技术。
J Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):329-37. doi: 10.1177/0885066609340640.
7
Characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a medical emergency team review for respiratory distress or hypotension.因呼吸窘迫或低血压接受医疗急救团队评估的患者的特征与结局
J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
8
Introduction of medical emergency teams in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre study.澳大利亚和新西兰医疗应急团队的引入:一项多中心研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R46. doi: 10.1186/cc6857. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
9
Increasing the use of an existing medical emergency team in a teaching hospital.增加教学医院中现有医疗急救团队的使用频率。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Dec;34(6):731-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400606.
10
Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams.首次医疗急救团队共识会议的结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2463-78. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000235743.38172.6E.